Perspectives of Women and Men Students and Faculty on Conceptual and Quantitative Problem-Solving in Physics from Introductory to Graduate Levels
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22047702 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Apekshya Ghimire (0009-0008-5624-9047, University of Pittsburgh, corresponding author), Chandralekha Singh (0000-0002-1234-5458, University of Pittsburgh) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 1602 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-27 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci15121602 |
| OpenAlex | W4416757040 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 100 |
Developing expertise in physics requires appropriate integration and assimilation of physics and mathematics. Instructors and students often describe physics courses in terms of their emphasis on conceptual and quantitative problem-solving. For example, they may argue that a course emphasizes primarily conceptual over quantitative problem-solving or may emphasize equally on both depending on instructional context and assessment design. In this study, we investigated how students and instructors across different levels of physics instruction perceive the roles and development of conceptual and quantitative problem-solving in student learning and expertise development. Using departmental surveys administered at the beginning and end of each semester, we collected both Likert-scale and open-ended responses from students enrolled in introductory, upper-level undergraduate and graduate physics courses. These surveys assessed students’ self-perceived skills, preferences, and perceptions of instructors and course emphasis. To complement student perspectives, we conducted interviews with instructors, using parallel questions adapted to reflect instructional goals and expectations. Our findings highlight patterns in how students and instructors prioritize conceptual and quantitative problem-solving across course levels, as well as alignment and misalignment between student and instructor perspectives. Also, although the questions were framed around conceptual versus quantitative problem-solving, we do not view them as mutually exclusive; rather we seek to understand perceived course emphasis and student expertise development from student and instructor points of view in a language commonly used in physics. These results can help shape teaching, course design, and assessment practices to better support the development of expert-like problem-solving skills in students in physics and related disciplines
Conceptual framework · Curriculum · Graduate students · Perception · Physics Education · The Conceptual Framework · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Science Education and Pedagogy · Statistics Education and Methodologies
Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests
A comparative study of the self‐efficacy beliefs of successful men and women in mathematics, science, and technology careers
Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices
Newton’s Second Law Teaching Strategies—Identifying Opportunities for Educational Innovation
Bioscience Students in Physics Courses with Higher Test Anxiety Have Lower Grades on High-Stakes Assessments and Women Report More Test Anxiety than Men
Stepping Stones
Helping Students Become Proficient Problem Solvers Part I
When Support Hides Progress
Influence on Students’ Learning in a Problem- and Project-Based Approach to Implement STEM Projects in Engineering Curriculum
The Effect of Self-Monitoring on Mental Effort and Problem-Solving Performance
A Framework for Understanding the Impact of Integrating Conceptual and Quantitative Reasoning in a Quantum Optics Tutorial on Students’ Conceptual Understanding
The context dependence of physics identity
Improving Girls’ Sense of Fit in Science
Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept
Signaling Threat
Self-efficacy
Stereotyping and its threat are real
Sex Roles and Perceptions of Femininity and Masculinity of Hispanic Women
The Influence of Female Role Models on Women’s Implicit Science Cognitions
Messages about brilliance undermine women's interest in educational and professional opportunities
Superstars and me
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans
STEMing the tide
Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
| Highly cited | No |
|---|