Navigating AI in Higher Education
Toward Culturally Responsive Assessment Frameworks in the GenAI Era
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22047351 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wei Yao (0000-0002-4054-5916, Zhejiang University), Shengfan Qian (0009-0009-0036-5775, Zhejiang University), Wengang Xie (0009-0000-2085-7245, Zhejiang University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1030 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16071030 |
| OpenAlex | W7166504536 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 25 |
The proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has precipitated an urgent, global reassessment of how higher education evaluates critical thinking, creative agency, and academic integrity. However, scholarly and institutional responses remain fragmented across cultural contexts, impeding the development of robust, flexible, and discipline-adaptable assessment frameworks. Responding to the imperative to move beyond the traditional standardized assessment paradigm, this study conducts a comparative discourse analysis of 5368 academic articles in Anglophone/Western scholarly discourse (Web of Science, WoS) and Chinese (CNKI). Using LDA topic modeling and Word2Vec-enhanced semantic analysis, the study identifies two divergent orientations: an Anglophone/Western discourse that frames AI as an instrument for cognitive augmentation, efficiency optimization, and functional human–AI collaboration; and a Chinese discourse that emphasizes epistemic sovereignty, the reconstruction of creative subjectivity, and systemic institutional rebuilding against technological alienation. These pathways are mapped onto a tripartite framework of Tools, Creative Subjectivity, and Organizational Ecosystems. The findings demonstrate that AI integration is culturally embedded rather than technically determined, carrying profound implications for assessment validity, academic integrity policy, and equitable access to AI-enhanced learning. The study synthesizes these insights into a culturally responsive assessment framework that redirects evaluation from standardized, product-centric outputs toward process-oriented, transparent, and ethically governed human–AI co-authorship. By centering critical autonomy, AI literacy, and epistemological diversity, this framework offers actionable strategies for inclusive assessment redesign, institutional policy development, and sustainable competency cultivation in the GenAI era
Cognition · Cultural diversity · Discourse analysis · Generative grammar · Higher education · Transdisciplinarity · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Educational Leadership and Innovation · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Rewriting the Language of Creativity
Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus
A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education
The PRISMA 2020 statement
False-Positive Psychology
The evolution of China’s English education policy and challenges in higher education
Research on international and global higher education
Generative AI and multimodal data for educational feedback
Learning to work with the black box
Talk is cheap
Decoding Academic Integrity Policies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |