Investigating the Effectiveness of Case-Based Socio-Legal Pedagogy in Developing Critical Thinking
Evidence from Muslim Women’s Legal Experiences in Israel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22048368 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tajread Keadan (Al-Qasemi Academic College of Education, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 984 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-21 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Education Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2227-7102 • E-ISSN: 2227-7102 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/educsci16060984 |
| OpenAlex | W7166344594 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
Developing critical thinking is a central aim of contemporary higher education, yet conventional instructional approaches often underuse authentic, real-world materials that stimulate higher-order reasoning and reflective judgment. The study examines the effectiveness of case-based socio-legal pedagogy in fostering critical thinking within contexts of legal pluralism and social complexity. A quasi-experimental mixed-methods pre–post design was conducted with 62 undergraduate students enrolled in a course on Islamic law and society. Over a four-week intervention, students engaged with six socio-legal cases drawn from Muslim women’s legal experiences in Israel, focusing on divorce, maintenance (nafaka), and child custody. Quantitative data were collected using a validated Critical Thinking Rubric assessing argumentation, evaluation of multiple perspectives, and legal reasoning. Results showed significant improvement in overall critical thinking, with gains across all measured dimensions. Qualitative analysis of written assignments and student reflections revealed greater recognition of legal ambiguity, more structured and evidence-based argumentation, and deeper engagement with competing normative and social frameworks. Overall, the findings highlight the pedagogical value of integrating socio-legal complexity into case-based learning as an adaptable model for strengthening critical thinking across disciplines involving interpretive, contested, and context-dependent knowledge in higher education and other fields requiring careful judgment under conditions of uncertainty and change
Critical thinking · Higher education · Normative · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Rubric · Student engagement · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A Beme systematic review
Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically
An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments
Transformative Learning
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science
Human Rights under State-Enforced Religious Family Laws in Israel, Egypt and India
Sharīʿa
Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?
Conceptualizations and instructional strategies on critical thinking in higher education
A review of rubric use in higher education
Who’s Afraid of Legal Pluralism
Return to Legal Pluralism
What is Legal Pluralism
Notes on the Anomaly of the Shari'a Field in Israel
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Mixed Methods Research
Formative assessment and self-regulated learning
Legal Pluralism
| Highly cited | No |
|---|