Increasing opportunities for movement in Nova Scotia, Canada
A community case study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22075968 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emily Burke (0000-0002-5813-7785, Dalhousie University), Sara Kirk (0000-0003-2146-4448, Dalhousie University), Simran Bhamra (Dalhousie University), Stephanie Heath (0000-0002-9257-1083, Electric Power Research Institute), Elaine Shelton (Ministry of Culture), Maggie Locke (Dalhousie University), Sarah A Moore (0000-0003-3712-0199, Dalhousie University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 1739584-1739584 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1739584 |
| PMID | 41799486 |
| OpenAlex | W7130505939 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
Introduction: (CoM) is a four-year (2022-2026) community-wide initiative designed to increase opportunities for low-barrier, less-structured movement (e.g., walking, wheeling, cycling, gardening, etc.) through policy, built-and socia-environment actions and cross-sector partnerships. Objectives: To describe the CoM Phase 1 actions across four Nova Scotian communities, detail the participatory evaluation approach, and share early implementation insights. Methods: CoM applies a socio-ecological and participatory approach. Four communities were selected via a competitive application process assessing readiness and investments for active transportation. Communities received funding, communication support, and access to a multisectoral network to develop and implement action plans. A multi-phase, mixed-methods evaluation (Phase 1: Fall 2022-Spring 2023) tracked activities and outcomes. Results: Phase 1 findings show that three communities formed leadership teams, delivered social programs, improved infrastructure, and initiated a public engagement campaign to promote a culture of movement. One community experienced a delay in leadership formation due to staff leave; however, existing leaders and partners were leveraged to drive project actions. Feedback from communities shows early indicators that CoM has strengthened community capacity for cross-sector collaboration and resource mobilization. Conclusion: This community case study offers guidance for others to consider when implementing and evaluating community movement initiatives. Early findings align with existing evidence which suggest that pairing environmental changes with social supports and sustained partnerships to be feasible and promising for implementation potential in rural, aging contexts. Phase 1 evaluation concentrated on process outputs that establish the groundwork for future outcome assessments. Subsequent phases will build on these foundations to further examine changes in movement behaviors, participation, and community capacity
Citizen journalism · Community engagement · Community organization · Nova scotia · Participatory action research · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Older Adults Driving Studies · Urban Transport and Accessibility
Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity
Validation of Walk Score for estimating access to walkable amenities
Transferring a Community-Based Participatory Research Project to Promote Physical Activity Among Socially Disadvantaged Women—Experiences From 15 Years of BIG
Participatory evaluation
Examining the Social and Built Environment Factors Influencing Children’s Independent Use of Their Neighborhoods and the Experience of Local Settings as Child-Friendly
Children’s right to the city and their independent mobility
Integration of Social Epidemiology and Community-Engaged Interventions to Improve Health Equity
Do parental perceptions of the neighbourhood environment influence children’s independent mobility? Evidence from Toronto, Canada
| Highly cited | No |
|---|