Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carcinogenicity of Poorly Soluble Low Toxicity Particles

Commentary on Epidemiology as a Risk Assessment “Reality Check”

Bibliographic Data

ID22076204
AuthorsKenneth A Mundt (0000-0002-9700-8679, Stantec (United States), corresponding author), Annette B Santamaria (Stantec (United States)), William J Thompson (0000-0002-9457-3234, Stantec (United States)), Christopher A Bates (Stantec (United States)), Corey Boles (0000-0002-6465-0323, Stantec (United States)), G Scott Dotson (0000-0002-3947-9149, Stantec (United States)), Mei Yong (0000-0002-2280-2640)
Year2022
Volume10
Pages920032-920032
Publication date2022-07-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2022.920032
PMID35903380
OpenAlexW4285041960
LanguageEN
References cited41

Inhaled particles that are poorly soluble or insoluble and of low toxicity (“poorly soluble low toxicity” or “PSLT” particles), can accumulate in the lung and at lung overload levels induce lung cancers in rats. The question of whether PSLT particles increase lung cancer risk in humans is complicated by large differences between rats and humans and the relatively large particle doses administered in animal studies even when compared with heavy human occupational exposures. We review the findings of epidemiological studies on occupational exposure to each of three different PSLT particles (carbon black, talc and taconite). The epidemiological evidence indicates that at even very high occupational exposure levels at which non-malignant respiratory diseases including pneumoconiosis and even talcosis are observed, lung cancer risks appear not to be elevated. Although positive human cancer risks might be predicted based on extrapolation from overload doses in rats to relevant exposures in humans, the epidemiological “reality check” based on the three examples indicates that these PSLT particles are unlikely to increase lung cancer risk in humans even at high occupational levels of exposure. Therefore, we propose that careful evaluation of the epidemiological evidence can serve as a “reality check” for human risk assessment and help balance the risk evaluation process

Biology · Carcinogen · Environmental health · Lung · Lung cancer · Pathology · Risk assessment · Toxicity · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment · Medicine · Occupational and environmental lung diseases · Epidemiology · Internal Medicine · Oncology · Physiology · Toxicology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae