Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Leadership tasks in public health

Findings from the National Board of Public Health Examiners’ job task analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID22077223
AuthorsCerina Lee (0000-0001-6465-8686, Johns Hopkins University, corresponding author), Anthony Dissen (0000-0003-0828-387X, Stockton University), Michael Bowen (0000-0001-7801-9420, Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation), Rick Kurz (National Board of Medical Examiners), Allison Foster (0000-0001-8779-6088, National Board of Medical Examiners), David R Buys (0000-0001-8547-056X, Mississippi State University)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1583383-1583383
Publication date2025-06-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1583383
PMID40589819
OpenAlexW4411356492
LanguageEN
References cited18

Introduction Public health leadership plays a crucial role in shaping effective health policies and practices. The National Board of Public Health Examiners (NBPHE) conducts a job task analysis (JTA) survey every 5–7 years to update the Certified in Public Health (CPH) examination. The objective of this study is to examine the JTA findings on leadership tasks in public health practice. Methods In April 2022, through the collaboration of expert panels and a validation survey, 103 tasks organized into ten domains were established for the JTA survey. The JTA survey was distributed online to current public health professionals. Across the tasks in the ten domains, respondents were asked about frequency (Scale of 1–6; how often they performed this task) and criticality (Scale of 1–5; how important this task was to their job). Results A total of 2,091 public health professionals responded to at least 82 of the 103 tasks (80%) and were included in the analysis. Approximately 86% of respondents worked in the United States and 41% had earned their CPH credential. Average frequency ratings ranged from 2.38 to 5.58, indicating that task ratings ranged from being performed never performed, every few years to daily. Average criticality ratings ranged from 2.46 to 4.64, indicating that task ratings ranged from not important to critically important. Specific to leadership, it was found that the ‘leadership’ domain ranked 2 nd highest for both frequency and criticality. Conclusion Our findings suggest that leadership-focused development as part of academic public health programs and continuing education for the workforce is essential. Future research may examine how individuals perform on the leadership domain of the CPH exam across multiple characteristics to better inform additional workforce development strategies

Job analysis · Job satisfaction · Management · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Applied Psychology · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Public Health Policies and Education · School Health and Nursing Education · Social Psychology

  • Transactional versus transformational leadership

    Open Access•Deanne N Den Hartog, Jaap J VAN Muijen et al.•Journal of Occupational and…•1997

  • Building a New Generation of Public Health Leaders Forged in a Public Health Crisis

    Susan C Helm-Murtagh, Paul Campbell Erwin•American Journal of Public Health•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae