Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reconsidering dependence on life-sustaining treatment as a criterion for assisted suicide

The Italian legal unicum in comparative perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID22077238
AuthorsMarco Albore (0000-0003-3072-4459, Sapienza University of Rome, corresponding author), Letizia Sorace (Sapienza University of Rome), S Del Prete (0009-0006-4585-7683, Sapienza University of Rome), Raffaele La Russa (0000-0003-3433-7122, University of L'Aquila), Gianpietro Volonnino (0000-0002-3178-0797, Sapienza University of Rome), Paola Frati (0000-0002-0358-7965, Sapienza University of Rome), Giorgio Bolino (0000-0003-4198-5662, Sapienza University of Rome)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1657070-1657070
Publication date2025-09-19
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1657070
PMID41048285
OpenAlexW4414366127
LanguageEN
References cited50

The legalization of Medical Assisted Voluntary Death, including assisted suicide is spreading worldwide, alongside the recognition of the centrality of the patient’s right to self-determination even in case of therapeutic desistance. In Italy Law-no. 219/2017 has granted patients the option of refusing therapy including life-sustaining treatments even without justification. The present paper offers a critical analysis of the legal-normative aspects and ethical-clinical implications of constraining assisted suicide to dependence on life-sustaining treatments. Reviewing some of the key bioethical-legal pronouncements, we discuss the current Italian system on assisted suicide in which dependence on life-sustaining treatment, even after the recent Constitutional sentences, is still one of the mandatory requirements, despite several critical profiles. Through a literature overview on medical life-sustaining treatments notion, the dependence on them is analyzed and assessed in clinical, bioethical and validity terms as a requirement for access to assisted suicide. From this it appears how dependence on life-sustaining treatment constraint shows overly ambiguous definitional boundaries, with the risk of inhomogeneous interpretations especially in the Italian framework. Interestingly, our comparative analysis reveals that Italy is a global legal unicum among the main international systems regulating Medical Assisted Voluntary Death; which, conversely, tend to target the issue on terminally or irreversibly suffering patients, independently of dependence on life-sustaining treatment

Bioethics · Centrality · Legalization · Medical ethics · Ethics in medical practice · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient Dignity and Privacy

  • Attitudes and Practices of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe

    Ezekiel J Emanuel, Ezekiel Emanuel et al.•JAMA•2016

  • European Countries' Different Legal Orientation About End-of-Life Issues in Patients Affected With Neurological/Psychiatric Diseases

    Open Access•Nicola Di Fazio, Silvia Romano et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2021

  • Italian Legal Euthanasia

    Open Access•Maricla Marrone, P Berardi et al.•Frontiers in Sociology•2022

  • Legal Euthanasia in Belgium

    Tinne Smets, Johan Bilsen et al.•Medical Care•2010

  • Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide in Selected European Countries and US States

    Nicole Steck, Matthias Egger et al.•Medical Care•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae