Correlation between job burnout, psychological status, and job satisfaction among anesthesiologists in the post-Covid-19 era

A cross-sectional study in China

Bibliographic Data

ID22079657
AuthorsXuemeng Chen (Deyang Stomatological Hospital), Rui Zhou (0000-0003-2412-8634, Tongji University), Xianjie Zhang (0009-0001-2058-1813, Deyang Stomatological Hospital), Jia Han (0000-0001-6427-8966, Deyang Stomatological Hospital), Ju Feng (0000-0001-9415-9845, Deyang Stomatological Hospital), Feng Ju (0000-0003-4137-5928), Yukai Zhou (0009-0007-3339-093X, Deyang Stomatological Hospital), Leqiang Xia (Deyang Stomatological Hospital, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume13
Pages1555141-1555141
Publication date2025-06-17
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2025.1555141
PMID40600159
OpenAlexW4411389091
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited29

Background Burnout is a prevalent issue among healthcare professionals, particularly anesthesiologists, with significant repercussions for patient safety, personal well-being, and institutional efficiency. The post-COVID-19 era has introduced additional psychological and socioemotional stressors, which individuals perceive differently. This study aims to assess burnout levels among anesthesiologists in this era, explore its relationship with psychological status and job satisfaction, and propose potential intervention strategies. Methods Four hundred electronic questionnaires were distributed to anesthesiologists licensed in 2024 with over 1 year of clinical experience. Three hundred twenty-six responses were collected, yielding an 81.5% response rate. The survey instruments included the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS), The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale – 21 Items (DASS-21), and Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (MSQ-SF). Descriptive statistics and adjusted linear regression were employed to analyze the data and examine the relationships between burnout, psychological status, and job satisfaction. Results The study revealed a high prevalence of burnout, with 30.67% of participants at high risk and 24.85% exhibiting burnout syndrome, resulting in an overall burnout rate of 55.52%. Demographic factors were significantly associated with burnout ( p < 0.05). Anesthesiologists aged 30–34 reported higher levels of anxiety and depression, while those aged over 35 showed lower levels of depersonalization and higher personal accomplishment ( p < 0.001). Job satisfaction was inversely correlated with burnout ( p < 0.001). Psychological status was positively correlated with burnout (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression analysis explained 55.00% of the variance in burnout, with anxiety, stress, and intrinsic and extrinsic satisfaction as significant predictors ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Burnout is widespread among anesthesiologists in the post-COVID-19 era, with burnout levels strongly associated with mental health and job satisfaction. Increased negative emotions and reduced job satisfaction contribute to higher burnout. Addressing the well-being of anesthesiologists, fostering a supportive work environment, and improving compensation mechanisms could alleviate burnout and enhance the quality of medical practice

Burnout · China · Cross-sectional study · Disease · Job satisfaction · Job stress · Political science · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · COVID-19 and Mental Health · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout · Medicine · Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access