Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Degarelix vs. leuprorelin for the treatment of prostate cancer in China

A cost-utility analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID22085347
AuthorsJianzhou Yan (China Pharmaceutical University), Caiyun Li (0000-0002-0213-9706, China Pharmaceutical University), Bin Zhang (0009-0002-1717-0375, China Pharmaceutical University), Xuefang Zhang (0009-0001-7318-1450), Luyan Cheng (China Pharmaceutical University), Ruilin Ding (0009-0006-9824-1284, China Pharmaceutical University), Lingli Zhang (0000-0003-1407-8098, Nanjing Medical University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume10
Pages942800-942800
Publication date2022-07-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpubh.2022.942800
PMID35923949
OpenAlexW4285728615
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited20

Objective: To explore the cost-effectiveness of degarelix acetate for injection (degarelix) compared to leuprorelin in prostate cancer (Pca) castration treatment from Chinese healthcare system perspective. Methods: A Markov model, adapted from the one established in Finland was conducted for the cost-effectiveness analysis of degarelix and leuprorelin for Pca treatment. The main data were derived from global phase III clinical trials of degarelix (CS21), published study and expert surveys. Outcomes, utility and costs of prostate cancer patients were calculated on a 30-year time horizon. The CS21 study based population of intention-to-treat (ITT) population and three scenarios were modeled. Taking three times of the Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (242,928 yuan, 2021) as the acceptable threshold for cost-effectiveness. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed on key parameters, including transition probabilities, costs, utility, and discount rate to test the robustness of the model. Results: Base case analysis for ITT population revealed that total costs of degarelix and leuprorelin were 566,226 yuan and 489,693 yuan, while the total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 5.19 and 4.51 during the 30-year time horizon, resulting an incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 112,674 yuan/QALY which was 1.39 times the GDP per capita, lower than willingness-to-pay level of three times the GDP per capita. The results for scenario analyses revealed that compared to leuprorelin, degarelix for Pca treatment in China was cost-effective. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model was most sensitive to price of 80 mg degarelix, utility of 1st-line therapy, hazard ratio of PSA recurrence, price of 3.75 mg leuprorelin, response rate of docetaxel per cycle, and discount rate of cost. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, compared to leuprorelin, the probability of degarelix to be cost-effective was 53 and 81% for willingness-to-pay threshold of one and three times the GDP per capita. Conclusion: Compared to leuprorelin, degarelix for prostate cancer treatment is cost-effective. Moreover, scenario, one-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses revealed that the model was robust

Cancer · Cost effectiveness · Economics · Environmental health · Gross domestic product · Gynecology · Leuprorelin · Per capita · Population · Prostate cancer · Statistics · Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism · Mathematics · Medicine · Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment · Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research · Internal Medicine

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis of second-generation androgen receptor antagonists for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

    Open Access•Yang Yang, Yaqing Chen et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae