Intra-household joint decision making on child feeding and associated social determinants in rural districts of South Ethiopia
A multi-site concurrent mixed method study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22089148 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kassahun Fikadu Tessema (0000-0002-3702-6103, Arba Minch University), Kassahun Fikadu, Abinet Takele (Arba Minch University), Biruk Tesfaye, Biruk Hailu Tesfaye (0000-0002-1594-8086, Government of Ethiopia), Zeleke Hailemariam Abebo (0000-0002-1304-7401, Wachemo University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Pages | 1381068-1381068 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1381068 |
| PMID | 39735758 |
| OpenAlex | W4405338358 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 63 |
Background: Improving joint intra-household decision-making by spouses is a promising solution to improve child-feeding practices. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the status and barriers of intra-household joint decision making on child feeding in rural districts of South Ethiopia from the perspectives of primary caregivers and key individuals. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted from July 15 to September 15, 2023 in three randomly selected rural districts: Arba Minch Zuria, Mierab Abaya, and Chencha, in Southern Ethiopia. We employed a cross-sectional study design to collect quantitative data. A computer generated random number technique was used to include 25% of the total kebeles from each district. A total of 20 kebeles; 8 from 32 kebeles of chencha, 6 from 24 kebeles of Mierab Abaya, and 6 from 24 kebeles of Arba Minch Zuria were included. A total of 1,479 women with their children aged 6-23 months were recruited from family folder of the health extension program using a simple random sampling technique. A descriptive qualitative study design was used to collect data from 51 focus group discussants and 12 key informants. Trained health professionals collected the data using a structured and pre-tested interviewer administered questionnaire and semi-structured interviewer guide for quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Univariate analysis was used to determine the frequency and percentages while Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to identify the associated factors. The odds ratio with a 95%CI was computed to assess strength of the association. The principles of saturation were adhered during the qualitative data collection. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data in themes and subthemes, using ATLAS.ti version 23. Results: Overall, more than two-thirds (69.2%) of the intra-household decision-making regarding child feeding were found to be jointly decided by the spouses. Women with formal education (AOR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.37-2.46), husband involvement in child feeding (AOR = 2.23, 95%CI: 1.70-2.92), having fewer than or equal to three children (AOR = 1.51, 95%CI: 1.11-2.04), women aged 25-34 years (AOR = 1.57, 95%CI: 1.19-2.07) and 35-49 years (AOR = 2.14, 95%CI: 1.38-3.33) were significantly associated with joint decision-making regarding child feeding practices. Moreover, large family sizes, large age gaps between husbands and wives, and gender inequalities were identified as barriers to women's engagement in intra-household decision making based on qualitative analysis. Conclusion: In the rural districts of southern Ethiopia, joint intra-household decision making regarding child feeding was found to be satisfactory. Maternal education, husband's involvement in child feeding, mother's age, and number of children were independent variables that significantly influenced women's engagement in joint intra-household decision making on child feeding. Interventions targeted at improving women's engagement in decision-making should consider the following sociocultural barriers: extreme age differences between couples, large family sizes, and detrimental gender-oriented norms
Cross-sectional study · Environmental health · Family medicine · Focus group · Interview · Logistic regression · Multistage sampling · Population · Simple random sample · Breastfeeding Practices and Influences · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine
Factors Associated With Women’s Health Care Decision-Making Autonomy
Women's autonomy in household decision-making
Women's Empowerment
Woman, culture, and society.
Spousal age-gaps, partner preferences, and consequences for well-being in four Colombian communities
Intrahousehold Bargaining and Resource Allocation in Developing Countries
Women's empowerment and child nutrition
Associations between social support, psychological well‐being, decision making, empowerment, infant and young child feeding, and nutritional status in Ugandan children ages 0 to 24 months
Women’s Participation in Household Decision Making and Justification of Wife Beating
Women’s autonomy in health decision-making and its effect on access to family planning services in Senegal in 2017
Married women's decision making power on modern contraceptive use in urban and rural southern Ethiopia
Burden of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy
Women’s bargaining power and spending on children’s education
Husband and Wife Perspectives on Farm Household Decision-making Authority and Evidence on Intra-household Accord in Rural Tanzania
The Impact of Bolsa Família on Women’s Decision-Making Power
Associations between women’s bargaining power and the adoption of rust-resistant wheat varieties in Ethiopia
Context and measurement
Measuring women’s decisionmaking
Worth fighting for
On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children
Can women's autonomy impede male involvement in pregnancy health in Katmandu, Nepal
There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons
The influence of women's empowerment on maternal health care utilization
On Kinship Structure, Female Autonomy, and Demographic Behavior in India
Decision Making within the Household
How Many Focus Groups Are Enough? Building an Evidence Base for Nonprobability Sample Sizes
| Highly cited | No |
|---|