What Does “Good” Community and Public Engagement Look Like? Developing Relationships With Community Members in Global Health Research
Bibliographic Data
Community and public engagement (CPE) is increasingly becoming a key component in global health research. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) is one of the leading funders in the UK of global health research and requires a robust CPE element in the research it funds, along with CPE monitoring and evaluation. But what does “good” CPE look like? And what factors facilitate or inhibit good CPE? Addressing these questions would help ensure clarity of expectations of award holders, and inform effective monitoring frameworks and the development of guidance. The work reported upon here builds on existing guidance and is a first step in trying to identify the key components of what “good” CPE looks like, which can be used for all approaches to global health research and in a range of different settings and contexts. This article draws on data collected as part of an evaluation of CPE by 53 NIHR-funded award holders to provide insights on CPE practice in global health research. This data was then debated, developed and refined by a group of researchers, CPE specialists and public contributors to explore what “good” CPE looks like, and the barriers and facilitators to good CPE. A key finding was the importance, for some research, of investing in and developing long term relationships with communities, perhaps beyond the life cycle of a project; this was regarded as crucial to the development of trust, addressing power differentials and ensuring the legacy of the research was of benefit to the community
Business · CLARITY · Community engagement · Community health · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Computer Science · Engineering · Global Health and Surgery · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Nursing
Standard Involvement Is Not Enough
Assessing Risk Thresholds in Controlled Human Infection Models (CHIM)
The “3 Ps” of EmPowerment, Partnership and Protection - Stakeholder Perceptions of Beneficial Outcomes of Engagement in HIV Prevention Trials
Co‐production to understand online help‐seeking for young people experiencing emotional abuse and neglect
A Co‐Produced Stakeholder Workshop to Identify Key Time Points and Targets for Life‐Course Prevention of Multiple Long‐Term Conditions
MapStakes-PH
The Development and Application of the Qualitative Triangulation Framework (QTF) for Exploring Tension Within and Across Qualitative Data Sets
A History of Global Health
What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research
The values and principles underpinning community engagement approaches to tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR)
Constructing citizen engagement in health research priority‐setting to attend to dynamics of power and difference
The ethics and politics of community engagement in global health research
Public Participation in Health and Social Care
Ethical Goals of Community Consultation in Research
Toward increased engagement between academic and indigenous community partners in ecological research
Thematic Analysis
| Citations per year | 1.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |