Cross-Situational Word Learning in Two Foreign Languages
Effects of Native Language and Perceptual Difficulty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22092575 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alba Tuninetti (0000-0002-0087-7756, Australian Research Council, corresponding author), Karen E Mulak (0000-0002-0387-2109, Australian Research Council), Paola Escudero (0000-0002-8071-7663, Australian Research Council) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2020.602471 |
| OpenAlex | W3113796329 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 47 |
Cross-situational word learning (CSWL) paradigms have gained traction in recent years as a way to examine word learning in ambiguous scenarios in infancy, childhood, and adulthood. However, no study thus far has examined how CSWL paradigms may provide viable learning pathways for second language (L2) word learning. Here, we used a CSWL paradigm to examine how native Australian English (AusE) speakers learned novel Dutch (Experiment 1) and Brazilian Portuguese (Experiment 2) word-object pairings. During each learning phase trial, two words and objects were presented without indication as to which auditory word belonged to which visual referent. The two auditory words formed a non-minimal or vowel minimal pair. Minimal pairs were classified as “perceptually easy” or “perceptually difficult” based on the acoustic-phonetic relationship between AusE and each L2. At test, participants again saw two visual referents but heard one auditory label and were asked to select the corresponding referent. We predicted that accuracy would be highest for non-minimal pair trials (in which the auditory words associated with the target and distractor object formed a non-minimal pair), followed by perceptually easy minimal pairs, with lowest accuracy for perceptually difficult minimal pair trials. Our results support these hypotheses: While accuracy was above chance for all pair types, in both experiments accuracy was highest for non-minimal pair trials, followed by perceptually easy and then perceptually difficult minimal pair trials. These results are the first to demonstrate the effectiveness of CSWL in adult L2 word learning. Furthermore, the difference between perceptually easy and perceptually difficult minimal pairs in both language groups suggests that the acoustic-phonetic relationship between the L1-L2 is an important factor in novel L2 word learning in ambiguous learning scenarios. We discuss the implications of our findings for L2 acquisition, cross-situational learning and encoding of phonetic detail in a foreign language
Linguistics · Perception · Referent · Speech recognition · Categorization, perception, and language · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems
Perception of Portuguese Mid Vowels by Heritage Speakers of Brazilian Portuguese
Evidence-Based Design Principles for Spanish Pronunciation Teaching
The effect of label mixing on vocabulary acquisition
Cross-situational word learning of Cantonese Chinese
Does phonetic training benefit word learning
Acquisition of novel word meaning via cross situational word learning
The role of phonology in non-native word learning
Statistical learning of foreign language words in younger and older adults
Investigating Orthographic Versus Auditory Cross-Situational Word Learning With Online and Laboratory-Based Testing
Implicit and Explicit Language Learning
A critical period for second language acquisition
The bilingual advantage in novel word learning
Do Bilinguals Activate Phonological Representations in One or Both of Their Languages When Naming Words?
Learning to perceive and recognize a second language
Rapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics
Perception of the speech code.
A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels
The Robustness of Critical Period Effects in Second Language Acquisition
Critical period effects in second language learning
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science
Form-Focussed Instruction and Second Language Acquisition
Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2
Age, Rate and Eventual Attainment in Second Language Acquisition
The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels
Foreign Accents
Detecting outliers
A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system
Perceived phonetic dissimilarity and L2 speech learning
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |