Does phonetic training benefit word learning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21506264 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yuxin Ge (0000-0002-9971-7532, NOVA University Lisbon), Susana Correia (0000-0001-7340-7184, NOVA University Lisbon), João Dinis Fernandes (0000-0002-5675-3963, NOVA University Lisbon), Kirsty Hanson (Lancaster University), Anabela Rato (0000-0001-7822-8580, University of Toronto), Patrick Rebuschat (0000-0002-5903-3478, Lancaster University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 277-304 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Second Language Acquisition (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0272-2631 • E-ISSN: 1470-1545 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0272263125101459 |
| OpenAlex | W7125716192 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
Recent research has shown that adult learners can rapidly acquire novel words of a foreign language by tracking cross-situational statistics, but learning is substantially reduced when the target words are phonologically similar and contain non-native contrasts. We expand on this research by investigating whether perceptual discrimination training on non-native target contrasts facilitates cross-situational learning of new words (CSWL). Our design combines perceptual training and CSWL to test the transfer of perceptual gains to lexical learning—an approach that integrates methods from L2 speech and statistical learning. In two studies, we tested English-native and Portuguese-native speakers’ learning of 24 Portuguese pseudowords via a CSWL task. In Study 1, we examined baseline learning in both language groups without prior training. In Study 2, English-native speakers were assigned to one of three conditions: phonetic training with an AX discrimination task, phonetic training with an oddity discrimination task, or no phonetic training prior to the CSWL task. Results confirmed that adults can learn non-native words from cross-situational statistics, and that phonological overlap between words decreases learning. Perceptual training improved the discrimination of target contrasts, but this did not transfer to statistical learning of words that contain these contrasts. These findings suggest that phonetic training alone may not be sufficient for vocabulary acquisition, suggesting the need for instructional approaches that integrate phonetic training with more explicit teaching methods or meaning-based practice
Perception · Phonetics · Speech perception · Transfer of learning · Transfer of training · Vocabulary · Word learning · Categorization, perception, and language · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/
Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research
The Novel Object and Unusual Name (Noun) Database
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Cognitive Correlates of Bilingualism
Rapid Word Learning Under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics
Gorilla in our midst
Nonnative and second-language speech perception
Training Japanese listeners to identify English / r / and / l /
The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (Leap-Q)
The Effectiveness of Second Language Pronunciation Instruction
Cross-Situational Word Learning in Two Foreign Languages
Effects of phonetic training and cognitive aptitude on the perception and production of non-native speech contrasts
Learning vocabulary and grammar from cross-situational statistics
High-Variability Phonetic Training enhances second language lexical processing
The role of phonology in non-native word learning
Position paper
Non-native phonemic discrimination, phonological short term memory, and word learning
Hearing and Seeing Tone Through Color
Learning pitch patterns in lexical identification by native English-speaking adults
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |