Leadership of the Republic of Kenya in the Multinational Security Support Mission for Haiti

Experience and Lessons for ad hoc Coalitions

Bibliographic Data

ID22098237
AuthorsSergey Tishkov (0000-0003-0406-0900, Oryol Law Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation named after V. V. Lukyanov), Sergey A Tishkov (V.V. Lukianov Orel Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume25
Issue3
Pages366-381
Publication date2025-10-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueVestnik RUDN International Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2313-0660 • E-ISSN: 2313-0679
PublisherPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-3-366-381
OpenAlexW4415521631
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited18

The article examines the role of the Republic of Kenya in providing security beyond the African continent and the potential of an ad hoc coalition formed of “secondary” states as an alternative to institutionalized collective security systems in the context of new forms of peacekeeping development. In the 2020s, it became evident that the liberal peacebuilding paradigm was not applicable to Haiti. At present a failed state could not resist the growth of gangsterism without external military support, which has led to a serious security crisis. In October 2023, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) authorized the deployment of the Kenya-led Multinational Security Support mission (MSS) to assist the Haitian authorities in confronting urban gangs. The mission’s mandate was extended in September 2024. The deployment of this mission signals the start of a new cycle of external intervention in Haiti. The purpose of this article is to analyze the experience and lessons of the formation and functioning of a stabilization ad hoc coalition involving “secondary” states, and the role of the leader state (by the example of Kenya) in a changing international environment. The study’s methodology is based on interdisciplinary, historical and systemic approaches. It is stated that the readiness of the Republic of Kenya to lead the coalition forces demonstrates an increased ability of African states to play a leading role in providing security beyond the continent. However, the deployment of the international mission has been significantly delayed. Currently, the stabilization forces have very limited resources and capabilities with which to support the Haitian national police. A thorough examination of the initial phase of the MSS in Haiti confirms the working hypothesis that the effectiveness of the coalition forces is associated with the role of a leading state with international authority and resources for a stabilization or peacekeeping operation. The experience of the initial stage of the coalition forces’ mission revealed a gap between the ambitions of “secondary” states and their capacity to conduct coalition operations independently. Along with the common difficulties of providing predictable and sustainable funding for similar operations, the MSS faced a number of national-level challenges related to the establishment of a legal framework for the deployment of Kenyan peacekeepers to Haiti, as well as a lack of support from the Kenyan opposition and public. It is noted that the United States (US) continues to patron “failed states” and creates coalitions with “secondary” states, involving them in the US geopolitical goals in the Caribbean region achievement

International security · Mandate · Multinational corporation · Peacekeeping · Security Sector Reform · Software deployment · The Republic · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Maritime Security and History · Peacebuilding and International Security

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access