Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is All Phenomenology Presentational

Bibliographic Data

ID22109207
AuthorsPeter V Forrest (0000-0003-4231-0464, Auburn University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume8
Issue0
Publication date2022-12-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueErgo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2330-4014 • E-ISSN: 2330-4014
PublisherUniversity of Michigan Library (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3998/ergo.2242
OpenAlexW4313205242
LanguageEN
References cited16

This paper is about two questions in contemporary philosophy of mind, which I call the Scope Question and the Marks Question. The Scope Question is this: What kinds of mental states (events or processes) have phenomenal character, and how many different kinds of phenomenal character are there? The Marks Question is this: What are the distinguishing “marks” of the phenomenal, in virtue of which a mental state, event, or process counts as being phenomenally conscious? To make progress on these questions and explore the relationship between the two, I narrow my focus to a particular instance of each, viz. the (scope) question of whether thoughts possess their own phenomenal character and the (marks) question of whether all phenomenal character is presentational. First, I argue that a phenomenology of entertaining thought content, if it exists, is non-presentational. I then argue from the fact that every genuine phenomenal property can be thought about using a phenomenal concept, to the conclusion that all phenomenology is presentational. One implication is that a (standard form of) transparent, proprietary phenomenology of thought does not exist

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Presentational and representational acting · Computer Science · Mathematics · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology

  • Phenomenal Concepts and Phenomenal Knowledge

    Torin Alter, Sven Walter•Phenomenal Concepts and…•2007

  • Thinking about Consciousness

    David Papineau•Thinking about Consciousness•2002

  • Reference and Consciousness

    John Campbell•Reference and Consciousness…•2002

  • Perception and the Fall from Eden

    David J Chalmers•Perceptual Experience•2006

  • On a confusion about a function of consciousness

    Open Access•Ned Block•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1995

  • The Content and Epistemology of Phenomenal Belief

    David J Chalmers•Consciousness•2003

  • Materialism and Qualia

    Open Access•Joseph Levine•Pacific philosophical quarterly•1983

  • What Is the Role of Consciousness in Demonstrative Thought?

    Declan Smithies, Inc Journal of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•2011

  • The Epistemic View of Subjectivity

    Scott Sturgeon, Journal Of Philosophy Inc et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•1994

  • The limits of perceptual phenomenal content

    Open Access•Peter V Forrest•Philosophical Studies•2020

  • Intentionalism and Perceptual Presence

    Open Access•Adam Pautz•Philosophical Perspectives•2007

  • Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness

    Jessica Wilson, John Perry•The Philosophical Review•2002

  • The Spatial Content of Experience

    Open Access•Brad Thompson•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2010

  • Philosophical investigations

    Ludwig Wittgenstein•Philosophical investigations•1974

  • Perception and the Reach of Phenomenal Content

    Tim Bayne•The Philosophical Quarterly•2009

  • Gappiness and the Case for Liberalism about Phenomenal Properties

    Tom Mcclelland•The Philosophical Quarterly•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae