The illusion of meritocracy
A critical analysis of open selection for senior leadership in Indonesia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22110398 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mirayanti Mirayanti (Universitas Muslim Indonesia, corresponding author), Masdar Mas’ud (0009-0002-8503-2636, Universitas Muslim Indonesia), Bahar Sinring (0009-0003-2354-2670, Universitas Muslim Indonesia), Ramlawati Ramlawati (0009-0000-0968-3555, Universitas Muslim Indonesia), Abd Kahar (Universitas Madako Tolitoli), Fiansi Fiansi (Management Sciences (United States)) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cogent Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2331-1886 • E-ISSN: 2331-1886 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/23311886.2025.2484472 |
| OpenAlex | W4408955805 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 50 |
This study examines the alignment of Indonesia’s open selection process for senior leadership with meritocratic principles and assesses the influence of sociopolitical factors on its outcomes. It also evaluates the effectiveness of the process in mitigating political interference, nepotism, and favoritism in public-sector appointments. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 18 participants selected through convenience sampling, including senior public sector officials, policymakers, reform advocates, and rejected candidates. The findings reveal that while the early stages of the selection process, such as written tests and interviews, adhere to meritocratic ideals, political connections increasingly influence the later stages, undermining merit-based decisions. This shift reflects broader trends in developing countries, where political networks often outweigh meritocratic criteria in leadership appointments. This study highlights the need for stronger safeguards and oversight in the final stages of the process to ensure a truly merit-based system. Limitations include reliance on self-reported data and a regional focus on Sulawesi, which may limit generalizability. Future research should involve broader participant groups across regions and sectors to gain more comprehensive insight
Attractiveness · Economics · Management · Meritocracy · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Asian Studies and History · Computer Science · Family Business Performance and Succession · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Law · Psychology
Toward good practice in thematic analysis
Organizational culture as a mediator of credible leadership influence on work engagement
Bureaucratic reform as an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia
School leadership in Indonesia
Meritocracy, meritocratic education, and equality of opportunity
The tyranny of meritocracy and elite higher education
Revisiting the old debate
Meritocracy and Advantaged Parents’ Perceptions of the Fairness of School Choice Policies
Collide or Collaborate
The Illusion of Merit and the Demons of Economic Meritocracy
Socio-political dynamics of alternative food networks
Women’s Political Representation in Indonesia
Business and Politics in Urban Indonesia
Time to negotiate Singapore’s meritocracy? Getting ready for the future of work and education
Leadership is a sacred matter’
Elite role conceptions and Indonesia’s agency in the Asean Outlook on the Indo-Pacific
Culture of Meritocracy, Political Hegemony, and Singapore’s Development
Design principles for creating digital transparency in government
Can meritocracy replace democracy? A conceptual framework
The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia
When does class matter? Unequal representation in Indonesian legislatures
Meritocracy, social mobility and a new form of class domination
What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance
Meritocracy, Elitism and Inequality
Comparing Trudeau and Harper Canadian federal appointments to agencies, boards, and commissions
Framing school choice and merit
Personnel Politics
Does Meritocracy Produce Desirable Outcomes for Public Organizations? Results of a Worldwide Expert Survey from 149 Nations
The paradox of local inequality
The illusion of meritocracy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |