Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Self-Evidence of Illusion

Alternative Truth by Schelling and the Gospel of Mark 16:1–8

Bibliographic Data

ID22121053
AuthorsKurt Appel (0000-0003-2040-6094, University of Vienna, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume8
Issue1
Pages108-132
Publication date2022-07-07
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInterdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2364-2807 • E-ISSN: 2365-3140
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.30965/23642807-bja10038
OpenAlexW4289531239
LanguageEN

The question of verity in our day’s discourses within society, culture and religion challenges philosophy in the face of fake news, manipulations and the virtual. This paper addresses, via an exploration of the later philosophy of F.W.J. Schelling and the Gospel of Mark, whether the illusionary of history ought to be recognised as a form of truth. In his “Positive Philosophy”, Schelling claims that history is characterised by a loss of meaning that cannot be compensated for by philosophy, morality and sciences, and which is caused by a thinking-mode of “presentness”, that knows no true past and future. As a contrast, he proposes the “illusion” of eschatological-utopian thinking, as paradigmatically laid down in the biblical idea of kenosis. The Gospel of Mark also refers to the traumatic character of history, and in its final chapter imparts the notion of a possible counter-history

Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Gospel · Illusion · Literature · Morality · Theology · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychology · Violence, Religion, and Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae