Doing for Circular Time What Shoemaker Did for Time without Change

There are possible worlds in which time is circular and finite in duration, forming a loop of, say, 12,000 years. There are also possible worlds in which time is linear and infinite in both directions and in which history is repetitive, consisting of infinitely many 12,000-year epochs, each two of which are exactly alike with respect to all intrinsic, purely qualitative properties. Could one ever have empirical evidence that one inhabits a world of the first kind rather than a world of the second kind? We argue for the affirmative answer, contra Quine, Newton-Smith, and Bergström. Our argument for that conclusion differs from an argument for the same conclusion due to Weir. Weir’s argument is probabilistic and explicitly requires having evidence against determinism. Our argument is a direct appeal to the simplicity of laws, and it involves no probabilistic component. It is modeled on Shoemaker’s argument that one could have evidence of time without change

Biology · Deep time · Physics · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Philosophy, Science, and History · Paleontology

• The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Death

  Ben Bradley, Fred Feldman et al.•The Oxford handbook of the…•2012

  Incluir item

• The Death of Nietzsche's Zarathustra

  Open Access•Paul S Loeb•Death of Nietzsche's Zarathustra•2010

  Incluir item

• No End in Sight

  Open Access•Richard Hanley•Synthese•2004

  Incluir item

• Time and Personal Identity in Nietzsche's Theory of Eternal Recurrence

  Open Access•Scott Jenkins, Scott A Jenkins•Philosophy Compass•2012

  Incluir item