Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Cross-linguistic scope ambiguity

An investigation of English, Spanish, and Mandarin

Datos Bibliográficos

ID22159643
AutoresYongjia Song (0000-0001-6839-522X, University of California, Irvine), Abimael Hernandez Jimenez (California University of Pennsylvania), Gregory Scontras (University of California, Irvine)
Año2021
Volumen6
Número1
Páginas572
Fecha de publicación2021-03-20
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaProceedings of the Linguistic Society of America (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2473-8689 • E-ISSN: 2473-8689
EditorialLinguistic Society of America (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3765/plsa.v6i1.4992
OpenAlexW3136238083
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas6

Faced with a sentence like Every horse didn't jump over the fence as a description of a scenario in which one out of two horses jumped, adults readily endorse the utterance as a good description, while children overwhelmingly reject it. However, systematic changes to the task setup lead to marked increases in children's endorsement rates (Musolino & Lidz 2006; Viau et al. 2010). Savinelli et al.(2017) use a computational cognitive model of utterance endorsement in truth-value judgment tasks to analytically demonstrate that both children and adults' interpretation behavior is affected by pragmatic manipulations. We test a clear prediction of these models: manipulating the conversational goal (or Question Under Discussion) should lead to clear effects on utterance endorsement. In addition to investigating the predictions for English, we also investigate Spanish and Mandarin, where the status of the relevant ambiguity may be less clear

Ambiguity · Cognitive psychology · Linguistics · Mandarin Chinese · Mean length of utterance · Sentence · Utterance · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems

  • When pragmatics matters more for truth-value judgments

    Open Access•Gregory Scontras, Lisa Pearl et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2021

  • The Rational Speech Act Framework

    Open Access•Judith Degen•Annual Review of Linguistics•2022

  • Navigating Ambiguity

    Open Access•Cecilia Solís-Barroso, Acrisio Pires et al.•Languages•2025

  • Predicting Pragmatic Reasoning in Language Games

    Open Access•Michael C Frank, Noah D Goodman•Science•2012

  • Information structure in discourse

    Open Access•Craige Roberts•Semantics and Pragmatics•2012

  • Scope assignment in child language

    Open Access•Peng Zhou, Stephen Crain•Lingua•2009

  • The Question-Answer Requirement for scope assignment

    Open Access•Andrea Gualmini, Sarah Hulsey et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2008

  • Why children aren't universally successful with quantification

    Open Access•Julien Musolino, Jeffrey Lidz•Linguistics•2006

  • Some knowledge children dont lack

    Open Access•Andrea Gualmini•Linguistics•2004

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año0,6
Intervalo de citas2021 - 2025 (5)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 3
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae