Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Going beyond general competencies in teachers' technological knowledge

Describing and assessing pre-service physics teachers' competencies regarding the use of digital data acquisition systems and their relation to general technological knowledge

Bibliographic Data

ID22166273
AuthorsGregor Benz (0000-0003-4506-2160, Karlsruhe University of Education, corresponding author), Tobias Ludwig (0000-0001-8603-6861, Karlsruhe University of Education)
Year2023
Volume8
Publication date2023-06-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/feduc.2023.1180973
OpenAlexW4382582583
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited48

The use of digital technologies and media in physics classrooms has pedagogical potential. In addition to everyday common technologies (e. g., presenters or computers), highly subject-specific media and technologies (e. g., simulation and digital data acquisition systems) are now available for these purposes. As the diversity of these technologies/media increases, so do the required competencies on the part of the (pre-service) physics teachers who must be able to exploit the given potential. Corresponding competency frameworks and related evaluation instruments exist to describe and assess the corresponding competencies. These frameworks and scales are characterized by their generality and do not reflect the use of highly subject-specific technologies. Thus, it is not clear how relevant they are for describing competencies in highly subject-specific technological situations, such as working with digital data acquisition systems in educational lab work settings. Against this background, two studies are presented. Study 1 identifies empirically 15 subject-specific competencies for handling digital data acquisition systems in lab work settings based on a literary review of lab manuals and thinking aloud. In Study 2, based on the 15 identified competencies, an abbreviated content- and construct-validated self-efficacy scale for handling digital data acquisition systems is provided. We show that general technological-specific self-efficacy is only moderately related to the highly subject-specific self-efficacy of handling digital data acquisition systems. The results suggest that specific competency frameworks and measurement scales are needed to design and evaluate specific teaching and learning situations

Data acquisition · Data science · Knowledge Acquisition · Knowledge management · Computer Science · Digital literacy in education · Education and Digital Technologies · Gender and Technology in Education

  • Computational Literacy as an Important Element of a Digitized Science Teacher Education—A Systematic Review of Curriculum Patterns in Physics Teacher Education Degrees in Germany

    Open Access•Daniel Braun, Johannes Huwer•Education Sciences•2023

  • Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen•Statistical Power Analysis for…•2013

  • Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)

    Denise Schmidt, Denise A Schmidt et al.•Journal of Research on Technology…•2009

  • Verbal reports as data.

    K Anders Ericsson, Herbert A Simon•Psychological Review•1980

  • The technology acceptance model (TAM)

    Open Access•Rebeca Scherer, Ronny Scherer et al.•Computers & Education•2019

  • On the quest for validity

    Open Access•Rebeca Scherer, Ronny Scherer et al.•Computers & Education•2017

  • Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge

    Open Access•Sara Willermark•Journal of Educational Computing…•2018

  • Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers.

    Steven Krau, Stefan Krauss et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2008

  • The importance of attitudes toward technology for pre-service teachers' technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge

    Open Access•Rebeca Scherer, Ronny Scherer et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2018

  • Experts' views on digital competence

    Open Access•Jose Janssen, Slavi Stoyanov et al.•Computers & Education•2013

  • Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge

    Open Access•Leanna Archambault, Leanna M Archambault et al.•Computers & Education•2010

  • Assessing teacher candidates' general pedagogical/psychological knowledge

    Thomas Vo, Thamar Voss et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2011

  • When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.

    Mijke Rhemtulla, Patricia E Brosseau-Liard et al.•Psychological Methods•2012

  • The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models

    Craig K Enders, Craig Enders et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2001

  • Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge

    Open Access•P Mishra, Matthew J Koehler•Teachers College Record The Voice…•2006

  • The Framework DiKoLAN (Digital Competencies for Teaching in Science Education) as Basis for the Self-Assessment Tool DiKoLAN-Grid

    Open Access•Lena von Kotzebue, Monique Meier et al.•Education Sciences•2021

  • Two is better than one—Examining biology-specific TPACK and its T-dimensions from two angles

    Open Access•Lena von Kotzebue•Journal of Research on Technology…•2023

  • From digital literacy to digital competence

    Open Access•Garry Falloon•Educational Technology Research…•2020

  • Developing a short assessment instrument for Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK.xs) and comparing the factor structure of an integrative and a transformative model

    Open Access•Mirjam Schmid, Eliana Brianza et al.•Computers & Education•2020

  • Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research

    Open Access•Robin K Henson, J Kyle Roberts•Educational and Psychological…•2006

  • Examining the validity of the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework for preservice chemistry teachers

    Open Access•Feng Deng, Ching Sing Chai et al.•Australasian Journal of…•2017

  • Those Who Understand

    Open Access•Lee S Shulman•Educational Researcher•1986

  • Validity of psychological assessment

    Samuel Messick•American Psychologist•1995

  • Comparative fit indexes in structural models

    Peter M Bentler•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Teacher efficacy

    Open Access•Megan Tschannen‐moran, Megan Tschannen-Moran et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2001

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae