The effectiveness of working memory training on Iranian students’ academic performance
A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22166339 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Abed Mahdavi (0000-0002-3494-6000, University of Tehran), Elaheh Hejazi (0000-0003-3032-5554, University of Tehran), Marzieh Saviz (0000-0002-7358-7178, University of Tehran), Yaser Heidari (University of Tehran), Hoda Ghoraeian (University of Tehran) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2025.1456583 |
| OpenAlex | W4413940990 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
Introduction In the past several years, increasing interest has been in working memory training as a cognitive intervention to improve students’ academic performance. Despite the considerable interest in this topic, empirical support for the real efficacy of such interventions has been mixed and sometimes contradictory. This meta-analysis seeks to provide a systematic, evidence-based review of the functional effectiveness of working memory training. Methods For this purpose, we systematically searched all existing pertinent randomized controlled trials. The search was carried out both in major international academic databases, such as ScienceDirect, Elsevier, Wiley, Springer, Taylor & Francis, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar, and reliable national databases, such as IranDoc, MagIran, SID, Noormags, and Civilica. This research produced 20 qualifying studies with 628 subjects. Results The findings manifested a high heterogeneity among the studies and an indication of publication bias. The overall effect size of the impact of working memory training on academic performance was computed as g=1.01 (95% CI [0.05, 1.98]), indicating a statistically significant effect. However, the observed heterogeneity and possible bias in different studies render the interpretation difficult and cast doubt on the external validity of the findings. Discussion These results highlight the necessity for additional research employing more rigorous and better-controlled methodologies to more effectively establish the efficacy of working memory interventions in school settings
Cognition · Engineering management · Mathematics education · Medical education · Meta-analysis · Working memory · Working memory training · Cognitive Abilities and Testing · Computer Science · Engineering · Medicine · Psychology
Plans and the structure of behavior.
Models of Working Memory
Working Memory
Working Memory
Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children
Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment
N‐back working memory paradigm
From Thought to Action
Chapter 20 What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory?
Working memory and numeracy training for children with math learning difficulties
Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |