Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What Can Professional Scientific Societies Do to Improve Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

A Case Study of the American Elasmobranch Society

Bibliographic Data

ID22166608
AuthorsDavid Shiffman (0000-0002-6093-5559, Arizona State University, corresponding author), David S Shiffman, Triana Arguedas Álvarez, Charles W Bangley (0000-0002-6044-7694, Dalhousie University), Reilly Boyt, Isabelle M Côté (0000-0001-5368-4061, Simon Fraser University), Toby S Daly-Engel, Toby S Daly‐Engel (0000-0002-6471-2870, Florida Institute of Technology), Alexandra Davis (0009-0004-2349-9286, University of Alberta), Alexandra C D Davis, Leo C Gaskins (0000-0003-0764-9905, Marine Conservation Institute), Jasmin Graham (0000-0001-6838-6040), Rachel T Graham (0000-0001-8896-1778, International Maritime University of Panama), Shaili Johri (0000-0001-7481-7548, Pacific University), Catherine Macdonald (0000-0003-2146-4966, University of Miami), Catherine C Macdonald, E W Misty Paig-Tran, E W Misty Paig‐Tran (0000-0001-9317-4621, California State University, Fullerton), Alberto I Roca (0000-0002-7072-5301), Gail D Schwieterman (0000-0001-6356-0337, Carleton College), Lisa B Whitenack (0000-0003-1360-2783, Allegheny College), Tonya R Wiley (0000-0003-0435-0959), Lara A Ferry (0000-0002-9990-5592, Arizona State University)
Year2022
Volume7
Publication date2022-05-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/feduc.2022.842618
OpenAlexW4281984529
LanguageEN
References cited51

Scientific professional societies are reviewing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices and policies in response to recent calls for much-needed change. Organizations like scientific professional societies contribute to establishing disciplinary norms, and can influence the diversity of disciplinary workforces in multiple ways through both action and inaction. This paper examines these issues using the American Elasmobranch Society (AES), a medium-sized professional scientific society, as a case study. It consists of three parts: (1) an analysis of the demographics of AES members, leaders, and award winners; (2) an evaluation of a diversity initiative created by the society which includes a survey of program alumni focusing on potential improvements to the program; and (3) a synthesis of recommendations of steps that AES and similarly sized societies can take to better support DEI goals. AES’s membership in recent years is more than half women, but 71.5% of all leadership positions in the Society’s history (including all but two Presidents) have been held by men since the society was founded in 1983. AES’s membership has significantly fewer Black/African-American members than the United States scientific workforce overall, with just 1 member out of over 400 identifying as Black in 2019, and 86.6% of Society leadership positions have been held by white-presenting members. The Society’s diversity initiative has led to some limited professional benefits for awardees, but could benefit from additional resources and support to enact suggested expansions and improvements. We provide a series of actionable recommendations that will make the annual meetings of societies like AES, and the field of chondrichthyan science, safer and more inclusive

Affirmative action · Demographics · Discipline · Political science · Professional association · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Workforce · Career Development and Diversity · Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Law

  • Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM

    Open Access•E A Cech, Tom Waidzunas•Science Advances•2021

  • Gender bias in academia

    Open Access•Anaïs Llorens, Athina Tzovara et al.•Neuron•2021

  • Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology

    Open Access•Christopher H Trisos, J Auerbach et al.•Nature Ecology & Evolution•2021

  • Sexual Harassment and Perceptions of Power

    Open Access•Jeanette N Cleveland, Melinda E Kerst•Journal of Vocational Behavior•1993

  • Hidden figures in ecology and evolution

    Open Access•Maria N Miriti, Karen M Bailey et al.•Nature Ecology & Evolution•2020

  • Sexual Harassment of Women

    Engineering and Medicine Committee on Women in Science, Policy and Global…•Sexual Harassment of Women•2018

  • The pandemic push

    Open Access•Holly J Niner, Shaili Johri et al.•Socio-Ecological Practice Research•2020

  • Silence‐breaking butterfly effect

    Open Access•Aida Alvinius, A Holmberg•Gender Work and Organization•2019

  • Equal Employment Opportunity

    Open Access•Sebawit Bishu, Andrea M Headley•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Facing the Giant

    Open Access•Sebawit Bishu, Alan Kennedy et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Mapping the Margins

    Kimberlé Crenshaw, Kimberlé W Crenshaw•Stanford Law Review•1991

  • Intersectional Invisibility

    Open Access•Valerie Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie Purdie‐vaughn et al.•Sex Roles•2008

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae