College algebra students’ perceptions of exam errors and the problem-solving process
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 22166758 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mary E Pilgrim (0000-0002-9178-4052, San Diego State University), Linda C Burks (0000-0002-5516-0808, Santa Clara University, autor correspondente), Megan Ryals (University of Virginia), Sloan Hill-Lindsay (San Diego State University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-02-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Editora | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2025.1359713 |
| OpenAlex | W4407235663 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 33 |
The first 2 years of college mathematics play a key role in retaining STEM majors. This becomes considerably difficult when students lack the background knowledge needed to begin in Calculus and instead take College Algebra or Precalculus as a first mathematics course. Given the poor success rates often attributed to these courses, researchers have been looking for ways in which to better support student learning, such as examining the impact of enhancing study habits and skills and metacognitive knowledge. One way that students can enhance their metacognitive knowledge in order to modify their study habits and practices is through reflection on mistakes. For this paper in particular, we focus on mistakes students make on exams. We interviewed students after they took an exam and completed an exam analysis worksheet. As part of a study on the impact of metacognitive instruction for College Algebra students we found that students often attributed their exam errors to “simple mistakes.” However, we identified many of these errors as “not simple.” To understand students’ perceptions of their mistakes within the context of problem-solving, we adapted an established problem-solving framework as an analytical tool. We found that students’ and researchers’ classifications of errors were not aligned across the problem-solving phases. In this paper we present findings from this work, sharing the adapted problem-solving framework, students’ perceptions of their exam mistakes, and the relationship between students’ categorizations of their errors and the problem-solving phase in which the errors occurred. Understanding students’ perceptions of their mistakes helps us better understand how we might support them as learners and better situate them for success in the future
Algebra over a field · Mathematics education · Perception · Programming language · Pure mathematics · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Research and Pedagogy · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Mathematics · Psychology
Beyond intelligence
Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic performance
Women 1.5 Times More Likely to Leave STEM Pipeline after Calculus Compared to Men
Productive Failure in Learning Math
Learning from Errors
Study Habits, Skills, and Attitudes
Thematic analysis
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Impact of a Short-Term Professional Development Teacher Training on Students’ Perceptions and Use of Errors in Mathematics Learning
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |