Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Norwegian Political Discourse on Prohibiting Muslim Garments. An Analysis of Four Cases in the Period 2008–2018

Bibliographic Data

ID22201737
AuthorsBengt-Ove Andreassen (0000-0003-4246-7349, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume3
Issue4
Pages353-372
Publication date2020-01-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChanging Societies and Personalities (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2587-6104 • E-ISSN: 2587-8964
PublisherUral Federal University (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.15826/csp.2019.3.4.082
OpenAlexW2999819784
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited10

The public and political debate about Islam and Muslims in Norway have revolved around issues like topics of integration and “radicalisation” and the compatibility of Islam with democracy and “Western values”. Clothing related to Muslims – i.e. Muslim women – such as hijab, niqab, and burqa are in the public and political debate often referred to as examples that Islam is not compatible with “Norwegian” (or “Western”) values. Several political initiatives in order to ban Muslim garments in public places or in school has been rejected with reference to the Norwegian state’s obligations to Human Rights. This article will illustrate how the political debate about Muslim garments have evolved in the period from 2008 to 2018. Four cases will be presented to illustrate this development, and show how each case have been evaluated by the Ministry of Justice in order to decide whether or not the propositions could be a violation of the Norwegian state’s obligation to Human Rights. The fourth case will illustrate how secular arguments, and the strategic understanding of niqab and burqa as “neutrally designed”, paved the way for a national regulation and a ban on clothing covering the face in educational settings

Clothing · Democracy · Human rights · Islam · Norwegian · Obligation · Political science · Politics · Secularism · Sociology · Theology · Gender and Women's Rights · Law

  • Å innta (de) andres perspektiv – en fenomenologisk undersøkelse av kjerneelementene i KRLE og RE i LK20

    Open Access•Tonje Baugerud•Prismet•2023

  • Unveiling Compensatory Mechanisms of Muslim Minority Groups in Hungary

    Open Access•Jhanghiz Syahrivar, Tamás Gyulavári et al.•Changing Societies and…•2025

  • Harmonizing Intentions and Actions

    Open Access•Chairy, Jhanghiz Syahrivar et al.•Changing Societies and…•2025

  • The Faith Factor. How Scholars’ Religiosity Biases Research Findings on Secularization

    Open Access•Valeria Rainero, J Stolz et al.•Sociological Science•2026

  • Yearbook of Muslims in Europe, Volume 7

    Oliver Scharbrodt, Samim Akgönül et al.•Yearbook of Muslims in Europe,…•2016

  • Theorizing Islam

    Emin Poljarevic•Comparative Islamic Studies•2014

  • The Hijab Debate in the Norwegian Press

    Cora Alexa Døving•Journal of Religion in Europe•2012

  • Critics Not Caretakers

    Russell T Mccutcheon, Russell Mccutcheon•Critics Not Caretakers•2001

  • India as a Secular State

    Donald Eugene Smith•India As a Secular State•1963

Unique citing works4
Citations per year1,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae