The poetic, the personal and the political
Two Dutch translations of “L’Internationale”
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22219384 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elke Brems (0000-0001-6401-360X, KU Leuven), Francis Mus (0000-0003-0369-002X, Ghent University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-26 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | chronotopos – A Journal of Translation History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2617-3441 • E-ISSN: 2617-3441 |
| Publisher | Leipzig University Library (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.70596/cts172 |
| OpenAlex | W4410758995 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This contribution provides a comparative analysis of two Dutch translations of “L’Internationale”, one made by Henriette Roland Holst in 1900 and the other by Ernst van Altena in 1981, respectively. The comparison is relevant for two reasons: (1) the latter translation can be considered a reaction to the former; and (2) each translator paid particular attention to the literary rather than the musical characteristics of the source text. The lyrics are therefore given a prominent place in the analysis; at the same time, we also dwell on the multimodal dimensions of the text. Roland Holst’s version was clearly meant to be sung. In her translation, she added a number of forms of address, which make the text more personal. She also adapted the text to make it less party-political and incitive. Finally, her lyric can be considered more poetic than the original. Alternatively, the tenor of van Altena’s translation is more concrete and informal than the source text. He provides another view on the original, but one that is not necessarily less mediated one, contrary to what he has suggested in public reflections. The result is a hybrid form comprising a demarcation strategy with regard to Roland Holst and his preliminary wish of rendering the source text as completely as possible
Aesthetics · Art · Literature · Poetry · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Comparative and World Literature · History · Law · Literature, Politics, and Exile Studies · Translation Studies and Practices
| Highly cited | No |
|---|