The Development of the Assurance Relevance Interest Assessment Satisfaction (Arias) Collaborative Jigsaw Collaborative Learning Model in Writing News Text Class 8 Junior High School State 06 Medan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22226250 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Siti Nurjanah (0009-0006-0727-0830), Syahnan Daulay, Khairil Ansari (0000-0002-1445-7701) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 583-590 |
| Publication date | 2020-02-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2655-1470 • E-ISSN: 2655-2647 |
| Publisher | Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.33258/birle.v3i1.854 |
| OpenAlex | W3009693145 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
This study aims to determine (1) the process of developing a collaborative Jigsaw Cooperative Jigsaw Cooperative Assurance Relevance Interest Assessment (ARIAS) learning model in writing news texts (2) the results of the validation of the collaborative jigsaw cooperative Assurance Relevance Interest Assessment Satisfaction learning model (3) ) the effectiveness of learning outcomes that apply the collaborative Assurance Relevance Interest Assessment Satisfaction (ARIAS) learning model in jigsaw Cooperative in writing news texts by students of class VIII SMP Negeri 06 Medan. The test subjects consisted of material experts, design experts, Indonesian language study teachers, and VIII grade students of SMP Negeri 06 Medan. The results of this study indicate that (1) The results of the questionnaire needs that have been distributed can result that the respondent has never used a learning model that collaborates with other models, inspires confidence and is in accordance with student interests and students' assumption that news text material is too difficult and students feel confused organizing ideas when writing begins and find it difficult to arrange the first sentence in writing. (2) validation of material experts includes and validation of learning design experts. Validation in learning design get an average score of 89.02 gets very good criteria and validation results by material experts get an average score of 83.47 gets very good criteria (3) Test the effectiveness of learning products in the form of developing learning models of assurance relevance interest assessment satisfaction (ARIAS) Collaborative Jigsaw Cooperative of respondents 32 students consisting of 2 teachers of Indonesian Language and Literature studies who received an average of 80, 15% in the "very good" category. Students after using the development of the learning model Assurance Relevance Interest Assessment Satisfaction (ARIAS) collaborative jigsaw have improved learning outcomes compared to before using the development of the learning model of collaborative jigsaw cooperative assurance relevance interest assessment satisfaction (ARIAS). Thus the learning model Assurance Relevance Interest Assessment Satisfaction (ARIAS) collaborative cooperative jigsaw is more motivating, arouse students' self-confidence, independent and arises a sense of responsibility
Collaborative learning · Cooperative learning · Indonesian · Jigsaw · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Respondent · Teaching method · Computer Science · Education and Character Development · Educational Methods and Media Use · Educational Methods and Outcomes · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Optimization of Student Loyalty through Rewards and Students’ Satisfaction as Intervening Variables
The Influence of Jigsaw Cooperative Model toward Writing Exposition Text Ability of Class X At SMK Negeri 1 Pematang Siantar
Influence of Sense of Belonging to a School on Learners’ Loneliness in Single Gender and Co-Educational Institutions in Murang’a County, Kenya
Computer Application Learning Model Based on Brain Gym to Improve Student Learning Outcomes of PKOM Dehasen University Bengkulu
Development of Intercultural Communication Learning Materials Based on Needs Analysis
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.83 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2021 (2) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |