Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Academic freedom, the impact agenda, and pressures to publish

Understanding the driving forces in higher education

Bibliographic Data

ID22229596
AuthorsHamid Golhasany (McGill University, corresponding author), Brenna Harvey (0000-0002-6626-4290, McGill University)
Year2022
Volume2
Issue8
Publication date2022-08-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSN Social Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9283 • E-ISSN: 2662-9283
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s43545-022-00468-8
OpenAlexW4291899447
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited71

Academic freedom · Accountability · Higher education · Impartiality · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Publication · Publish or perish · Publishing · Sociology · Academic Freedom and Politics · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Higher Education Governance and Development · Law

  • Impact Agenda and Practices of Inclusion and Reward for Early Career Researchers in the Social Sciences and Humanities

    Open Access•Sanja Djerasimovic, Jenny Barke•Social Inclusion•2026

  • An alternative reading of the European Standards and Guidelines (ESG)

    Open Access•Lefkios Neophytou•Policy Futures in Education•2025

  • Les travaux de Hammersley et l’éducation au Québec

    Charles-Antoine Bachand•Tréma•2024

  • Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism

    Rosemary Deem, Sam Hillyard et al.•Knowledge, Higher Education, and…•2007

  • The Research Excellence Framework and the 'impact agenda'

    Ben R Martin•Research Evaluation•2011

  • Publish or Perish

    Open Access•Mark De Rond, Alan N Miller•Journal of Management Inquiry•2005

  • Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data

    Open Access•Daniele Fanelli, Enrico Scalas•PLoS ONE•2010

  • ‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework

    Open Access•Simon Smith, Vivienne Ward et al.•Research Policy•2011

  • Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

    Open Access•Ferric C Fang, R Grant Steen et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Die soziale Funktion der Wissenschaft

    J D Bernal•Die soziale Funktion der…•1986

  • Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture

    Open Access•Hendrik P Van Dalen, Kène Henkens•Journal of the Association for…•2012

  • Impacted geographers

    Open Access•Tom Slater•Area•2012

  • The perils of ‘impact’ for academic social science

    M Hammersley•Contemporary Social Science•2014

  • Do we need “more research” or better implementation through knowledge brokering

    Open Access•Janet G Hering•Sustainability Science•2015

  • The political economy of politics and international studies impact

    Open Access•Claire A Dunlop•British Politics•2018

  • Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists

    Open Access•Joeri K Tijdink, Reinout Verbeke et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2014

  • Making an ‘impact’

    Open Access•David Looseley•Arts and Humanities in Higher…•2011

  • The design and management of multi-stakeholder research networks to maximize knowledge mobilization and innovation opportunities in the forest sector

    Open Access•Nicole Klenk, Nicole Lisa Klenk et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2015

  • Academic freedom and civil society

    Open Access•Mostafa Bahgat Abdel-Motaal•Higher Education Policy•2002

  • Enhancing Academic Quality and Collegial Control

    Open Access•David D Dill•Higher Education Policy•2018

  • Contested Boundaries in Policy-Relevant Science

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff, Sheila S Jasanoff•Social Studies of Science•1987

  • Publish or perish

    Open Access•Icy Lee•Language Teaching•2014

  • The Composite Theory

    Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, Klaus D Beiter et al.•South African Journal on Human…•2015

  • Academic freedom and social responsibility

    Marian Sawer•Politics•1987

  • On justifying the different claims to academic freedom

    Open Access•Graeme C Moodie•Minerva•1996

  • Critical research impact

    Open Access•Ruth Machen•Area•2020

  • Mapping Academic Resistance in the Managerial University

    Open Access•Gina Anderson•Organization•2008

  • Impact in the REF

    Richard Watermeyer•Studies in Higher Education•2016

  • The Professional Self-Esteem of Teacher Educators

    Open Access•Richard J Reynolds•Journal of Teacher Education•1995

  • Tradition and Innovation in Scientists' Research Strategies

    Open Access•Jacob G Foster, Andrey Rzhetsky et al.•American Sociological Review•2015

  • What is business school research for? Academic and stakeholder perspectives, politics and relationality

    Steve Johnson, Kenneth Orr et al.•Studies in Higher Education•2020

  • Evaluating 'impact' in the UK's Research Excellence Framework (REF)

    Richard Watermeyer, Judith Chubb•Studies in Higher Education•2019

  • Academic freedom

    Terence Karran•Studies in Higher Education•2009

  • Technology and the Academics

    George A Gullette, Eric Ashby•Technology and Culture•1964

  • Audit culture and Illiberal governance

    Open Access•C Shore•Anthropological Theory•2008

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae