A behavioral analysis of whistleblowing at Japanese firms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22231092 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daisuke Asaoka (0000-0002-2174-2156, Meiji University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-020-00588-7 |
| OpenAlex | W3135479898 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 30 |
This paper analyzes the background to whistleblowing—one of the key means by which a spate of corporate misdeeds have been revealed at established Japanese firms—by applying a framework of psychology and organizational behavior to people’s decisions and judgments. The paper first analyzes the organizational aspects of whistleblowing, such as fear of retaliation within firms, and the psychological aspects, such as conflicts of interest that unconsciously favor sponsors. Despite such internal restraints, observed phenomena of whistleblowing paint a more nuanced picture of human psychology. Along with moral concerns, people have the desire to exhibit an appreciation of social trust and fairness, even when their actions are inconsistent with an economic calculus. Traditional Japanese firms are characterized by a collectivist culture featuring a meticulously crafted, closely knit internal order and lifetime employment. Information technology, however, has led to a more liquid flow of information on corporate misconduct, making it hard to conceal misdeeds that blur organizational boundaries and relativizing internal norms. These changes tip the psychological balance of people within firms and prompt firms to adapt. Changes in the corporate governance code, and a law requiring firms to introduce internal control systems, give whistleblowers the organizational protection which is key to according them psychological safety and encouraging constructive dissent. Advances in research from the behavioral perspective promise to deepen our understanding of Japanese corporate phenomena and behaviors
Business · Collectivism · Constructive · Corporate governance · Dissent · Economics · Individualism · Law and economics · Management · Misconduct · Organizational Behavior · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology
Self-serving altruism? The lure of unethical actions that benefit others
Contagion and Differentiation in Unethical Behavior
An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining
Third-party punishment and social norms
The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Law and Governance
Predicting employee reactions to perceived organizational wrongdoing
The power of moral concerns in predicting whistleblowing decisions
The whistleblower's dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff
Replicating Milgram
Bystander intervention in emergencies
Availability
Behavioral Study of obedience
Building Houses on Rocks
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |