Repeat collaboration and scientific innovation
Evidence from dynamic ego networks of Nobel laureates
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22231128 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alex J Yang (0000-0002-1276-0483, Fudan University, corresponding author), Jianming Guo (0009-0007-8408-481X, Nanjing University), Yujie Shi (0009-0006-2132-4516, Nanjing University), Sanhong Deng (0000-0002-6910-3935, Nanjing University, corresponding author), Star X Zhao (Fudan University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-025-05887-5 |
| OpenAlex | W4415427308 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 41 |
This study explores how collaboration dynamics influence scientific innovation in Physics, Chemistry, and Physiology or Medicine by analyzing the evolving ego networks of Nobel laureates. Using data from the Microsoft Academic Graph and an updated Nobel laureate dataset (1900–2024), we quantify collaboration patterns through collaboration length and cumulative coauthorship strength within dynamic ego networks. Innovation is measured via four field- and time-normalized metrics: Citation, Novelty, Disruption, and Interdisciplinarity. By studying Nobel laureates, exemplars of transformative science, this work tests and extends theories of collaboration dynamics in elite scientific networks, offering insights into the mechanisms driving innovation. Our findings reveal that Nobel-winning papers predominantly stem from new collaborations rather than sustained partnerships. Regression analyses show a negative association between repeat collaboration and innovation, with prolonged coauthoring linked to reduced novelty, disruptiveness, and interdisciplinarity, though this effect is less pronounced in Chemistry, suggesting field-specific dynamics. Career age differences between coauthors mediate this relationship, with larger gaps amplifying negative impacts on citation and disruptiveness, except in Chemistry, where the trend diverges. These insights highlight the value of fresh collaborations in driving transformative science in these fields and suggest tailored strategies for fostering innovation
Citation · Elite · Id, ego and super-ego · Nobel laureate · Scientific discovery · Transformative learning · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Knowledge Management and Sharing · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Interdisciplinarity as diversity in citation patterns among journals
Quantifying social group evolution
Co-authorship networks and research impact
Global citation inequality is on the rise
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology
Multi-University Research Teams
Science of science
Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact
Quantifying Long-Term Scientific Impact
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge
A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society
A global perspective on social stratification in science
Unveiling the dynamics of team age structure and its impact on scientific innovation
Microsoft Academic Graph
Limited diffusion of scientific knowledge forecasts collapse
Accelerating science with human-aware artificial intelligence
Fresh teams are associated with original and multidisciplinary research
Data, measurement and empirical methods in the science of science
The Strength of Weak Ties
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |