Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The amplification effect of unreasonable human behaviours on natural disasters

Bibliographic Data

ID22234112
AuthorsJie Fan (0000-0003-2441-5019, Chinese Academy of Sciences, corresponding author), Baoyin Liu (0000-0003-3370-7646, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Xiaodong Ming (0000-0002-8257-2488), Yong Sun (0000-0001-5978-2535, Guangzhou University), Lianjie Qin (0000-0002-3581-3752, Beijing Normal University)
Year2022
Volume9
Issue1
Publication date2022-09-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41599-022-01351-w
OpenAlexW4296775953
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited32

Natural disasters occur when environmental systems have a disruptive effect on the socio-economic system. In recent years, particular unreasonable human behaviours have amplified losses from natural disasters as result of the increasing complexity of human systems. Because of the lack of both quantitative calculation of this amplification, and analysis of the root cause of these behaviours, existing risk assessment and management research rarely includes unreasonable human behaviour as a critical factor. This study therefore creates three simulation scenarios, each based on a twenty-first-century catastrophe in China, and calculates the disaster losses that are amplified when such behaviour increases exposure (the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake), vulnerability (the 2014 Ludian earthquake) and hazard (the 2021 Zhengzhou rainstorm) levels. In doing so, it intuitively demonstrates the amplification effect caused by unreasonable human behaviour. The results show that these behaviours amplified disaster losses significantly: increased exposure due to unscientific planning nearly doubled the death toll in the Wenchuan earthquake; high vulnerability caused by the low economic level of residents increased the disaster losses of the Ludian earthquake more than tenfold; and the elevated hazard intensity caused by anthropogenic climate change resulted in a 1.44-times expansion of the area severely affected by the Zhengzhou rainstorm. These behaviours have become an important cause of disasters, and the main driving factors behind them—such as neglecting disaster risk; the inability to cope with disasters; and a lack of certainty about how to deal with extreme events—are the inevitable outcomes of societal development. On this basis, we constructed an extended risk framework that included unreasonable behavioural factors and a disaster mechanism, to analyse in depth the relationship between human behaviours and disaster risk prevention in different developmental stages. The results provide an important reference for the development of risk management policies to control these unreasonable behaviours

Business · China · Computer security · Death toll · Economic growth · Economics · Emergency management · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Hazard · Meteorology · Natural disaster · Natural hazard · Natural resource economics · Socioeconomics · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

  • Misperception of drivers of risk alters willingness to adapt in the case of sargassum influxes in West Africa

    Open Access•D Yaw Atiglo, Philip-Neri Jayson-Quashigah et al.•Global Environmental Change•2023

  • Early warning response to rainstorm

    Open Access•Ruining Ma, Jida Liu et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2024

  • Coupling human responsive behaviors and infrastructure disparities to understand the long-term impacts of wildfires

    Open Access•Jiayi Fu, Jingqiao Fu et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2025

  • Efficiency and greenness evaluation of urban land use change in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

    Open Access•Changqing Guo, Wenhui Kuang et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2024

  • Disasters as opportunities for enhancing sustainability values

    Open Access•Yan Wang•Sustainable Development•2023

  • Perception and Communication of Flood Risks

    Open Access•Wim Kellens, Teun Terpstra et al.•Risk Analysis•2013

  • From Poverty to Disaster and Back

    Open Access•Stephane Hallegatte, Adrien Vogt‐Schilb et al.•Economics of Disasters and…•2020

  • Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation

    Open Access•M Jarraud, Simon K Allen et al.•Managing the Risks of Extreme…•2012

  • Agency, Capacity, and Resilience to Environmental Change

    Open Access•Katrina Brown, Elizabeth Westaway•Annual Review of Environment and…•2011

  • Assessing future climate change impacts in the EU and the USA

    Open Access•Juan-Carlos Ciscar, James Rising et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2019

  • Tracking progress on the economic costs of disasters under the indicators of the sustainable development goals

    Roger A Pielke•Environmental Hazards•2018

  • The future of disaster risk management

    Allan Lavell, Andrew Maskrey•Environmental Hazards•2014

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1.67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae