ChatGPT as a Cobuild lexicographer
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22235014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Lew (0000-0002-6772-210X, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-10-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-023-02119-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4387618050 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 9 |
Creating high-quality dictionary entries has been a meticulous and time-consuming process, but current developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) could help to speed up this process. This study explores the use of ChatGPT to create COBUILD-style English monolingual entries and evaluates its ability to generate accurate and high-quality sense definitions and example sentences on a sample of fifteen verbs of communication. AI-generated entries are produced using ChatGPT Plus, and human experts evaluate them alongside COBUILD entries in a blinded randomized process. The quality of sense definitions, example sentences, and overall entries are assessed using a five-point scale. The results indicate that AI-generated definitions are comparable to those created by human lexicographers, while AI-generated examples and overall entries receive lower ratings. The study also explores the possibility of fine-tuning AI models based on expert feedback to enhance their performance
Lexicography · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Computer Science · Mathematics · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Text Readability and Simplification · Topic Modeling · Artificial Intelligence
New Developments in English for Special Purposes (ESP) Lexicology and Lexicography
Beyond Replacement
Dictionaries versus AI Tools through the Eyes of English Majors
Psychometrics and Linguistics in ChatGPT-Generated Reading Tests Compared with CET-4
The effectiveness of ChatGPT as a lexical tool for English, compared with a bilingual dictionary and a monolingual learner’s dictionary
Dictionaries and lexicography in the AI era
Machine-assisted quantitizing designs
Potencial ChatGPT pri razvoju Slovarja sopomenk sodobne slovenščine
More human than human? Differences in lexis and collocation within academic essays produced by ChatGPT-3.5 and human L2 writers
Can AI Understand Croatian Idioms? Assessing Large Language Models in Lexicographic Tasks
Prepoznavanje krajšav in razvezav v angleških besedilih s področja varstvoslovja z algoritmom Krajšavar ter orodjema ChatGPT in Perplexity
The Risks of Generative AI Non-Verifiable Interpretation
AI as a resource for the clarification of medical terminology
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4.33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |