Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Translation, adaptation and identity

The role of literature in Georgia’s Europeanization process (19th-century perspective)

Bibliographic Data

ID22235491
AuthorsGül Mükerrem Öztürk (0000-0003-1875-4954, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume13
Issue1
Publication date2025-12-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41599-025-06381-8
OpenAlexW4417145517
LanguageEN
References cited4

During the first half of the nineteenth century, Georgia experienced a complex process of Europeanization that reshaped its cultural and literary landscape. In this period, marked by the country’s incorporation into the Russian Empire, Georgian writers engaged with French and Russian literary traditions through translation, adaptation, and rewriting. This article examines how three key figures—Aleksandre Chavchavadze, Grigol Orbeliani, and Grigol Rcheulishvili—used translation not simply as a means of linguistic transfer but also as a tool for negotiating identity and cultural autonomy under imperial pressure. Drawing on postcolonial theory, comparative literature, and contextual analysis, this study explores how translated texts were creatively reconfigured to reflect local historical consciousness and ideological priorities. The findings show that translation functioned as a form of cultural resistance and hybrid expression, enabling Georgian authors to incorporate Enlightenment ideals, Romantic esthetics, and new genres while embedding them in native literary forms. Aleksandre Chavchavadze’s engagement with French classics, Grigol Orbeliani’s national rewriting of Russian poetry, and Grigol Rcheulishvili’s localization of European prose all exemplify how foreign influences were rearticulated through a distinctly Georgian lens. The article argues that these practices contributed to the emergence of a modern literary language and national subjectivity in Georgia. Rather than passive reception, the Europeanization of Georgian literature was shaped by active strategies of adaptation and ideological reinterpretation. This study contributes to postcolonial literary scholarship by demonstrating how peripheral literary systems employed translation as a medium of cultural self-determination during periods of asymmetrical power relations

Enlightenment · Georgian · Hybridity · Ideology · Literary criticism · Literary science · Poetics · Scholarship · Subjectivity · Comparative and World Literature · European Cultural and National Identity · Translation Studies and Practices

  • The Translator's Invisibility

    Lawrence Venuti•Translator's Invisibility•2003

  • What Is World Literature?

    David Damrosch•What Is World Literature?•2003

  • The Location of Culture

    Homi K Bhabha, Homi Κ Bhabha•Location of Culture•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae