Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Institutional pressure, resource orchestration, and the digital government performance

A mixed methods study in the case of China

Bibliographic Data

ID22236149
AuthorsYao Men (Central South University), Yuanyuan Xu (0000-0001-7147-4498, Central South University, corresponding author), Kai Yang (0000-0003-0493-9341, Central South University), Kaiyi Yang, Zijian Wang (0000-0001-5772-258X, Central South University), Xiang Ji (0000-0002-7234-6460, Columbia University)
Year2025
Volume12
Issue1
Publication date2025-11-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41599-025-05932-3
OpenAlexW4415816068
LanguageEN
References cited72

Governments worldwide are rapidly embracing digital transformation; however, limited attention has been paid to how local governments navigate under multiple pressures, including those from higher-level authorities, the public, and regional competition. Drawing on institutional pressure (IP) and resource orchestration (RO) theories, this study constructs an IP–RO framework to examine how these factors interact to achieve high digital government (DG) performance. Using a mixed-methods approach combining regression analysis and panel data QCA, this study demonstrates how local governments orchestrate resources to respond to multifaceted pressures, identifies the configuration paths, and reveals that local governments are gaining greater autonomy in shaping digital initiatives

Autonomy · China · Digital government · E-Government · Local government · Orchestration · E-Government and Public Services · Public Policy and Administration Research · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

  • Redesigning Social Inquiry

    C C Ragin•Redesigning Social Inquiry•2008

  • Capturing Causal Complexity

    Santi Furnari, Donal Crilly et al.•Academy of Management Review•2021

  • Digital government and public management research

    Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Sharon S Dawes et al.•Public Management Review•2018

  • Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value

    David G Sirmon, Michael A Hitt et al.•Academy of Management Review•2007

  • The Advocacy Coalition Framework

    Paul A Sabatier, Paul Sabatier et al.•Theories Of The Policy Process,…•2019

  • The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation

    Open Access•Susana Borra, Jakob Edler•Research Policy•2020

  • Fragmented property rights and their risks on foreclosed housing

    Open Access•Xingyu Qian•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Design for experience – a public service design approach in the age of digitalization

    Open Access•Jakob Trischler, Jessica Westman Trischler•Public Management Review•2022

  • Digitally-induced change in the public sector

    Open Access•Nathalie Haug, Sorin Dan et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • The Socio-Economic Efficiency of Digital Government Transformation

    Anna Sanina, Aleksey Balashov et al.•International Journal of Public…•2023

  • The impact of digital government on corporate green innovation

    Open Access•Xiaoli Hao, Erxiang Miao et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Impacts of digital government on regional eco-innovation

    Open Access•Shuliang Zhao, Linjiao Teng et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Future of e-Government

    Open Access•Suresh Malodia, Amandeep Dhir et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Regulating Big Tech expansionism? Sphere transgressions and the limits of Europe’s digital regulatory strategy

    Open Access•Tamar Sharon, Raphaël Gellert•Information Communication & Society•2024

  • Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis

    Open Access•Thomas Greckhamer, Santi Furnari et al.•Strategic Organization•2018

  • The Comparative Method

    C C Ragin•Comparative Method•1989

  • Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Carsten Q Schneider, Claudius Wagemann•Set-Theoretic Methods for the…•2012

  • The public value of E-Government – A literature review

    Open Access•Jean Damascene Twizeyimana, Annika Andersson•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Digital government transformation in turbulent times

    Open Access•Seok-Jin Eom, Jooho Lee•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • A Configurational Approach to Project Delays

    Open Access•Anna Krohwinkel•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2014

  • Digital Governance in China

    Jieren Hu, Xing‐Mei Zhang et al.•Journal of Contemporary China•2023

  • Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success

    Open Access•Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia, Miguel Á Flores-Zúñiga•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Proactive e-Governance

    Open Access•Dennis Linders, Calvin Zhou-Peng Liao et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • An attention-based view of AI assimilation in public sector organizations

    Open Access•Albandari Alshahrani, Donnacha Dennehy et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Leadership and institutional design in collaborative government digitalisation

    Open Access•Jessica Breaugh, Maike Rackwitz et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2023

  • Enabling AI capabilities in government agencies

    Open Access•Patrick Mikalef, Kristina Lemmer et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Digital government evolution

    Open Access•Tomasz Janowski•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • Know-how to lead digital transformation

    Open Access•Jeff J Pittaway, Jeffrey J Pittaway et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government data

    Open Access•Bo Fan, Yupan Zhao•Government Information Quarterly•2017

  • From e-government to we-government

    Open Access•Dennis Linders•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • Critical constraints on high performance of provincial E-governments in China

    Open Access•Xiaomin Zhang, Bin Chen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Overcoming barriers to digital government

    Open Access•Christopher Wilson, Ines Mergel•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • Big data analytics, resource orchestration, and digital sustainability

    Open Access•Dan Zhang, Loo Geok Pee et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Defining digital transformation

    Open Access•Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Strategies to advance the dream of integrated digital public service delivery in inter-organizational collaboration networks

    Open Access•Stijn Wouters, Marijn Janssen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2022

  • The Politics of Open Government Data

    Open Access•Erna Ruijer, Françoise Détienne et al.•The American Review of Public…•2019

  • Punctuations and diversity

    Qingguo Meng, Ziteng Fan•Policy Studies•2022

  • Local Autonomy in Temporary Organizations

    Open Access•Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren•Administration & Society•2021

  • Spillover effects of central cities on sustainability efforts in a metropolitan area

    Open Access•H Ji, Mark Patrick Tate•Policy Sciences•2020

  • How does policy attention affect e-government performance? The role of resource allocation and public–private collaboration

    Open Access•Taiting Pan, Bo Fan•International Review of…•2023

  • Digitalization of public sector organizations over time

    Open Access•Karin Fossheim, Jonas Lund‐tønnesen•International Review of…•2024

  • Party-Led Digitalization

    Open Access•Xingmiu Liao, Jinxu Zhao et al.•Chinese Political Science Review•2025

  • The impact of vertical and horizontal pressures on policy diffusion

    Meng Li, Jue Wang•Journal of Chinese Governance•2024

  • The Iron Cage Revisited

    P Dimaggio, Paul J Dimaggio et al.•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Making the China Data Valley - The National Integrated Big Data Centre System and Local Governance

    Kevin Ziyu Liu•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2025

  • How to build and analyze a panel data QCA model? A methodological demonstration of Garcia-Castro and Arino's panel data QCA model

    Open Access•Preya Bhattacharya•Methodological Innovations•2023

  • Longitudinal QCA

    Open Access•Christoph Niessen•Sociological Methods & Research•2024

  • Designing Research With Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)

    Open Access•Eva Thomann, Martino Maggetti•Sociological Methods & Research•2020

  • Case Studies Nested in Fuzzy-set QCA on Sufficiency

    Open Access•Carsten Q Schneider, Ingo Rohlfing•Sociological Methods & Research•2016

  • The Comparative Advantages of fsQCA and Regression Analysis for Moderately Large-N Analyses

    Open Access•Barbara Vis•Sociological Methods & Research•2012

  • Institutionalized Organizations

    J W Meyer, Brian Rowan•American Journal of Sociology•1977

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae