Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Collaboration of Stagist Approaches and Discursive Approaches on Ideas & Discourse in “Bela Negara” Policies in Prismatic Communities

Study in Situbondo Regency, Indonesia

Bibliographic Data

ID22237441
AuthorsAkhmad Juni Toa (Universitas Merdeka Surabaya), Syamsul Maarif (0000-0001-5638-3619), Syamsul Ma’arif (0000-0002-4105-4262, Universitas Jember), Edy Wahyudi (0009-0007-4254-0848, Universitas Jember), Supranoto Supranoto (Universitas Jember)
Year2023
Volume5
Issue9
Pages113-120
Publication date2023-09-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2663-7197 • E-ISSN: 2663-7197
PublisherAl-Kindi Center for Research and Development (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.32996/jhsss.2023.5.9.11
OpenAlexW4386889717
LanguageEN
References cited2

The “bela negara” program in Situbondo Regency focuses on collaborative efforts between Situbondo Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda) and “Pondok Pesantren” to produce a participatory policy process. Collaboration between the two is important in a prismatic society to accommodate the knowledge each party has in an inclusive public space. Although, to realize collaboration is not easy because it involves complex interests between the two. The study analyses the collaboration of “bela negara” policies in the prismatic Situbondo Regency. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA). The use of the IPA approach in this study is to analyze collaboration on “bela negara” policies in Situbondo Regency, both those carried out by policy actors or the Situbondo Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda) as well as those carried out by the target group or among the clergy. Based on the results of the discussion, it can be concluded that in the “bela negara” policy process in Situbondo Regency, there is a different knowledge construction between the actor and the target group. The Situbondo Regional Leadership Coordination Forum (Forkopimda), as a policy actor, relies on professional knowledge and scientific (indigenous) knowledge. While the target group or the clergy use local knowledge (endogenous). These different types of knowledge arise as a result of different policy approaches. Forkopimda Situbondo, as a policy actor, adopts a stagist or managerial policy approach. While the Ulama use a discursive approach to ideas & discourse that relies on their local knowledge. Even though there are differences in policy approaches, the two of them are able to collaborate well, seen in several activities, as seen in the 74th Anniversary of the Republic of Indonesia and the Commemoration of the 74th National Defense Day (HBN)

Citizen journalism · Political science · Public policy · Public relations · Sociology · Computer Science · Educational Curriculum and Learning Methods · Islamic Studies and Radicalism · Law · Public Administration · Public Administration in Developing Nations

  • Understanding Governance

    Open Access•Gerry Stoker, Robert Pyper•Public Policy and Administration•1997

  • Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg•Qualitative Inquiry•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae