Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Natural language processing and discourse complexity studies

Bibliographic Data

ID22248172
AuthorsMarina I Solnyshkina (0000-0003-1885-3039, Kazan Federal University), D S Mcnamara (0000-0001-5869-1420, Arizona State University), Radif R Zamaletdinov (0000-0002-2692-1698, Kazan Federal University)
Year2022
Volume26
Issue2
Pages317-341
Publication date2022-06-29
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRussian Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2686-8024 • E-ISSN: 2687-0088
PublisherPeoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU)
DOI10.22363/2687-0088-30171
OpenAlexW4283705262
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited43

The study presents an overview of discursive complexology, an integral paradigm of linguistics, cognitive studies and computer linguistics aimed at defining discourse complexity. The article comprises three main parts, which successively outline views on the category of linguistic complexity, history of discursive complexology and modern methods of text complexity assessment. Distinguishing the concepts of linguistic complexity, text and discourse complexity, we recognize an absolute nature of text complexity assessment and relative nature of discourse complexity, determined by linguistic and cognitive abilities of a recipient. Founded in the 19th century, text complexity theory is still focused on defining and validating complexity predictors and criteria for text perception difficulty. We briefly characterize the five previous stages of discursive complexology: formative, classical, period of closed tests, constructive-cognitive and period of natural language processing. We also present the theoretical foundations of Coh-Metrix, an automatic analyzer, based on a five-level cognitive model of perception. Computing not only lexical and syntactic parameters, but also text level parameters, situational models and rhetorical structures, Coh-Metrix provides a high level of accuracy of discourse complexity assessment. We also show the benefits of natural language processing models and a wide range of application areas of text profilers and digital platforms such as LEXILE and ReaderBench. We view parametrization and development of complexity matrix of texts of various genres as the nearest prospect for the development of discursive complexology which may enable a higher accuracy of inter- and intra-linguistic contrastive studies, as well as automating selection and modification of texts for various pragmatic purposes

Cognition · Cognitive complexity · Cognitive linguistics · Computational linguistics · Discourse analysis · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Naturalness · Rhetorical question · Syntax · Authorship Attribution and Profiling · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification · Artificial Intelligence

  • Parametric Taxonomy of Educational Texts

    Open Access•Roman Kupriyanov, Marina I Solnyshkina et al.•Vestnik Volgogradskogo…•2024

  • Why English Legal Discourse is Difficult to Understand

    Open Access•Ol'ga Litvishko, Tatyana Shiryaeva et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Collection and evaluation of lexical complexity data for Russian language using crowdsourcing

    Open Access•Aleksei V Abramov, Vladimir Ivanov et al.•Russian Journal of Linguistics•2022

  • Cognitive complexity measures for educational texts

    Open Access•Roman Kupriyanov, Olga Vladislavovna Bukach et al.•Russian Journal of Linguistics•2023

  • Ways of expressing the category of instrumentality in retranslated texts

    Open Access•Khalida N Galimova, Elzara V Gafiyatova et al.•Russian Journal of Linguistics•2023

  • Dataset of Uzbek base words

    Open Access•Khabibulla Madatov, Surayyo Khajibaeva et al.•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2026

  • Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix

    Open Access•D S Mcnamara, Arthur C Graesser et al.•Automated Evaluation of Text and…•2014

  • More Is Different

    Open Access•Philip W Anderson•Science•1972

  • Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.

    Arthur C Graesser, Murray Singer et al.•Psychological Review•1994

  • Defining and operationalising L2 complexity

    Bram Bulté, Alex Housen•Dimensions of L2 performance and…•2012

  • “Cloze Procedure”

    Open Access•Wilson L Taylor•Journalism Quarterly•1953

  • A new readability yardstick.

    Rudolph Flesch•Journal of Applied Psychology•1948

  • Family resemblances

    Open Access•Eleanor Rosch, Carolyn B Mervis et al.•Cognitive Psychology•1975

  • Computational assessment of text readability

    Kevyn Collins-Thompson, Kevyn Collins‐Thompson•ITL - International Journal of…•2014

  • Russian dictionary with concreteness/abstractness indices

    Open Access•Valery D Solovyev, Yulia Aleksandrovna Volskaya et al.•Russian Journal of Linguistics•2022

  • Devereux Teaching Aids Employed in Presenting Elementary Mathematics in a Special Education Setting

    Open Access•Edgar A Smith, Jack Quackenbush•Psychological Reports•1960

  • The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis

    Peter W Foltz, Walter Kintsch et al.•Discourse Processes•1998

  • Douglas Biber, Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge

    Open Access•Andreas H Jucker•Journal of Linguistics•1989

  • Situation models in language comprehension and memory

    Rolf A Zwaan, Gabriel A Radvansky•Psychological Bulletin•1998

  • Construing constructivism

    Open Access•Nancy Nelson Spivey•Poetics•1987

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae