Natural language processing and discourse complexity studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22248172 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marina I Solnyshkina (0000-0003-1885-3039, Kazan Federal University), D S Mcnamara (0000-0001-5869-1420, Arizona State University), Radif R Zamaletdinov (0000-0002-2692-1698, Kazan Federal University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 317-341 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Russian Journal of Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2686-8024 • E-ISSN: 2687-0088 |
| Publisher | Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.22363/2687-0088-30171 |
| OpenAlex | W4283705262 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 43 |
The study presents an overview of discursive complexology, an integral paradigm of linguistics, cognitive studies and computer linguistics aimed at defining discourse complexity. The article comprises three main parts, which successively outline views on the category of linguistic complexity, history of discursive complexology and modern methods of text complexity assessment. Distinguishing the concepts of linguistic complexity, text and discourse complexity, we recognize an absolute nature of text complexity assessment and relative nature of discourse complexity, determined by linguistic and cognitive abilities of a recipient. Founded in the 19th century, text complexity theory is still focused on defining and validating complexity predictors and criteria for text perception difficulty. We briefly characterize the five previous stages of discursive complexology: formative, classical, period of closed tests, constructive-cognitive and period of natural language processing. We also present the theoretical foundations of Coh-Metrix, an automatic analyzer, based on a five-level cognitive model of perception. Computing not only lexical and syntactic parameters, but also text level parameters, situational models and rhetorical structures, Coh-Metrix provides a high level of accuracy of discourse complexity assessment. We also show the benefits of natural language processing models and a wide range of application areas of text profilers and digital platforms such as LEXILE and ReaderBench. We view parametrization and development of complexity matrix of texts of various genres as the nearest prospect for the development of discursive complexology which may enable a higher accuracy of inter- and intra-linguistic contrastive studies, as well as automating selection and modification of texts for various pragmatic purposes
Cognition · Cognitive complexity · Cognitive linguistics · Computational linguistics · Discourse analysis · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Naturalness · Rhetorical question · Syntax · Authorship Attribution and Profiling · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification · Artificial Intelligence
Parametric Taxonomy of Educational Texts
Why English Legal Discourse is Difficult to Understand
Collection and evaluation of lexical complexity data for Russian language using crowdsourcing
Cognitive complexity measures for educational texts
Ways of expressing the category of instrumentality in retranslated texts
Dataset of Uzbek base words
Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix
More Is Different
Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.
Defining and operationalising L2 complexity
“Cloze Procedure”
A new readability yardstick.
Family resemblances
Computational assessment of text readability
Russian dictionary with concreteness/abstractness indices
Devereux Teaching Aids Employed in Presenting Elementary Mathematics in a Special Education Setting
The measurement of textual coherence with latent semantic analysis
Douglas Biber, Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
Construing constructivism
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |