Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Platonic Bias in der Sozialtheorie

Über den Begriff des Handelns bei Hannah Arendt und eine philosophische Kritik an der soziologischen Praxistheorie

Bibliographic Data

ID22286258
AuthorsTakemitsu Morikawa (0000-0001-6974-6466, Universität Luzern, Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakultät, Soziologisches Seminar, Hirschgraben 31, Postfach 7456, CH-6000 Luzern 7)
Year2010
Volume96
Issue4
Pages498-515
Publication date2010-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv für Rechts- und Wirtschaftsphilosophie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0177-1108 • E-ISSN: 2363-5606
PublisherWissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.25162/arsp-2010-0041
OpenAlexW3158833202
LanguageEN

Although Hannah Arendt distinguishes three human activities from each other in Human Condition - labor, work and action - they are supposed not to be three different types of human activities but to be three different aspects of human activity. Assuming this to be the case, this paper demonstrates that social theory has not enough taken action in the sense of Arendt into account, even modern scholars such as Bourdieu, but it has continued to remain almost always on the level of work because of its concept of time. The second question is what consequence social theory may draw, if this aspect of human activity is recognized as essential and its concept of time changed. One answer proposed by the author is the sociology of forgiveness even though it has not been treated as a subject for modern sociology

Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Geology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae