Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Speaking Truth to Power in a Digital Age

MeToo as Parrhesia

Bibliographic Data

ID2230004
AuthorsBeatrice Chateauvert-Gagnon (0000-0002-9045-1096, Centre for Social Innovation, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume49
Issue4
Pages831-857
Publication date2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSigns: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0097-9740 • E-ISSN: 1545-6943
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/729912
OpenAlexW4400446868
LanguageEN
References cited38

In October 2017, #MeToo quickly became a global phenomenon: shared over 12 million times on social media in the first twenty-four hours, reaching over eighty-five countries, there would be a “before” and an “after.” As a polyphonic global cry against the prevalence of sexual violations, #MeToo is hard to apprehend or theorize within traditional frameworks. Neither a social movement as such nor an organized, coordinated campaign, #MeToo has no leaders, structures, defined aims, or specific goals behind it. Hence, what exactly is #MeToo, and how can we understand it in all its contradictions, nuances, and complexities? This article argues that #MeToo can best be understood as a contemporary form of parrhesia, a practice from Ancient Greece that, as Michel Foucault writes, consists of speaking dangerous truth to power and taking risks in doing so out of a sense of duty to improve a situation for oneself and others. Seeing it in this way allows us to complicate our understanding of both #MeToo and parrhesia as a collective, polyphonic, and decentralized praxis that opened up new ways of being and doing (justice) in relation to sexual violations. It is the collective character of #MeToo and parrhesia on social media that led some dominant truths about sexual violations to be challenged while others remained intact. Hence, for feminist scholars and activists, seeing #MeToo as parrhesia and parrhesia as #MeToo provides avenues to capitalize on what courageous truth speaking on social media can achieve without exaggerating its reach, thus doing justice to the millions of voices that spoke out against sexual violations without ignoring the limitations of #MeToo and parrhesia

Physics · Power (physics) · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Psychology

  • In an Abusive State

    Kristin Bumiller•In an Abusive State•2008

  • MeToo, Weinstein and Feminism

    Open Access•Karen Boyle•MeToo, Weinstein and Feminism•2019

  • Speaking Out

    Open Access•Tanya Serisier•Speaking Out•2018

  • Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture

    Cary Nelson, Lawrence Grossberg•Marxism and the Interpretation of…•1400

  • Foucault on the Politics of Parrhesia

    Open Access•Torben Bech Dyrberg, T Dyrberg•Foucault on the Politics of…•2014

  • The Logic of Masculinist Protection

    Iris Marion Young•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2003

  • Resisting the Subject

    Open Access•Dianna Taylor•Foucault Studies•2013

  • MeToo and the Politics of Collective Healing

    Open Access•Allison Page, Jacquelyn Arcy•Communication Culture and Critique•2019

  • Towards a language of sexual gray zones

    Open Access•Lena Karlsson•Feminist Media Studies•2018

  • Counter-Conducts as a Mode of Resistance

    Carl Death•Global Society•2016

  • Performing Struggle

    Open Access•Bal Sokhi-Bulley•Law and Critique•2015

  • Reckoning up

    A Phipps•Gender and Education•2018

  • (Trans)forming #MeToo

    V Jo Hsu•Women s Studies in Communication•2019

  • The #MeToo narrative

    Open Access•Ying Hu, Ying Cheng Hu et al.•Women s Studies International Forum•2020

  • The protected, the protector, the defender

    Open Access•Judith Hicks Stiehm•Women s Studies International Forum•1982

  • Anxiety Veiled

    Nancy Sorkin Rabinowitz•Anxiety Veiled•1993

  • Critiquing state and gendered violence in the age of #MeToo

    Ashley Noel Mack, Bryan J Mccann•Quarterly Journal of Speech•2018

  • MeToo and the Politics of Social Change

    Rachel Loney-Howes Bianca Fileborn, Bianca Fileborn et al.•#MeToo and the Politics of Social…•2019

  • Ethics and Subjectivity

    Open Access•Nancy Luxon•Political Theory•2008

  • The politics and gender of truth-telling in Foucault’s lectures on parrhesia

    Open Access•Lida Maxwell•Contemporary Political Theory•2019

  • Me Too

    Open Access•Debra L Jackson•Feminist Philosophy Quarterly•2018

  • ParrhēsiaToday

    William Walters•Global Society•2014

  • Whose personal is more political? Experience in contemporary feminist politics

    Open Access•Alison Phipps•Feminist Theory•2016

  • Neo-liberal Subjectivity, Self-branding and 'My Rape Story' YouTube Videos

    Open Access•Carol Harrington•Critical Sociology•2019

  • Daring the Truth

    Open Access•A Folkers•Theory Culture & Society•2016

  • Feminist Rage

    Dianna Taylor•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2021

  • Performative, Passionate, and Parrhesiastic Utterance

    D Lorenzini•Critical Inquiry•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae