Speaking Truth to Power in a Digital Age
MeToo as Parrhesia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2230004 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Beatrice Chateauvert-Gagnon (0000-0002-9045-1096, Centre for Social Innovation, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 831-857 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-9740 • E-ISSN: 1545-6943 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/729912 |
| OpenAlex | W4400446868 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
In October 2017, #MeToo quickly became a global phenomenon: shared over 12 million times on social media in the first twenty-four hours, reaching over eighty-five countries, there would be a “before” and an “after.” As a polyphonic global cry against the prevalence of sexual violations, #MeToo is hard to apprehend or theorize within traditional frameworks. Neither a social movement as such nor an organized, coordinated campaign, #MeToo has no leaders, structures, defined aims, or specific goals behind it. Hence, what exactly is #MeToo, and how can we understand it in all its contradictions, nuances, and complexities? This article argues that #MeToo can best be understood as a contemporary form of parrhesia, a practice from Ancient Greece that, as Michel Foucault writes, consists of speaking dangerous truth to power and taking risks in doing so out of a sense of duty to improve a situation for oneself and others. Seeing it in this way allows us to complicate our understanding of both #MeToo and parrhesia as a collective, polyphonic, and decentralized praxis that opened up new ways of being and doing (justice) in relation to sexual violations. It is the collective character of #MeToo and parrhesia on social media that led some dominant truths about sexual violations to be challenged while others remained intact. Hence, for feminist scholars and activists, seeing #MeToo as parrhesia and parrhesia as #MeToo provides avenues to capitalize on what courageous truth speaking on social media can achieve without exaggerating its reach, thus doing justice to the millions of voices that spoke out against sexual violations without ignoring the limitations of #MeToo and parrhesia
Physics · Power (physics) · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Psychology
In an Abusive State
MeToo, Weinstein and Feminism
Speaking Out
Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture
Foucault on the Politics of Parrhesia
The Logic of Masculinist Protection
Resisting the Subject
MeToo and the Politics of Collective Healing
Towards a language of sexual gray zones
Counter-Conducts as a Mode of Resistance
Performing Struggle
Reckoning up
(Trans)forming #MeToo
The #MeToo narrative
The protected, the protector, the defender
Anxiety Veiled
Critiquing state and gendered violence in the age of #MeToo
MeToo and the Politics of Social Change
Ethics and Subjectivity
The politics and gender of truth-telling in Foucault’s lectures on parrhesia
Me Too
ParrhēsiaToday
Whose personal is more political? Experience in contemporary feminist politics
Neo-liberal Subjectivity, Self-branding and 'My Rape Story' YouTube Videos
Daring the Truth
Feminist Rage
Performative, Passionate, and Parrhesiastic Utterance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |