Indicatoren voor sociale cohesie
Het speciale geval van Japan en zijn implicaties
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22300384 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pepijn Van Houwelingen (0000-0002-7147-4719, Huisarts en Wetenschap, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 153-171 |
| Publication date | 2016-06-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Mens & Maatschappij (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-9454 • E-ISSN: 1876-2816 |
| Publisher | Amsterdam University Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.5117/mem2016.2.houw |
| OpenAlex | W3162861893 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Indicators for social cohesion. Japan as a special case and its implications. How to measure social cohesion? There are, in the literature, two main methods for measuring social cohesion: one can measure trust or one can measure civic participation in different kinds of groups. It will be argued that both methods appear to suffer from two biases. First, universal forms of social cohesion are prioritized. Second, in general, perceptions are measured instead of actual behaviour. These two biases are not without consequences, especially with regard to comparative research. Using Japan as an example it is shown that these biases indeed exist and that the use of other indicators would result in quite different outcomes
Cohesion (chemistry) · Data mining · Group cohesiveness · Measure (data warehouse) · Perception · Sociology · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies · Psychology · Social Capital and Networks · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2017 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |