Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Impact of Dialect on the Acquisition of Sounds and their Clusters

The Results of a Non-word Repetition Test

Bibliographic Data

ID22333989
AuthorsEglė Krivickaitė-Leišienė (0000-0002-5256-9536, Vytautas Magnus University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Issue14
Pages133-147
Publication date2020-12-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTaikomoji kalbotyra (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2029-8935 • E-ISSN: 2029-8935
PublisherVilnius University Press (PUBLISHER • LT)
DOI10.15388/taikalbot.2020.14.10
OpenAlexW3115003747
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited25

The paper aims to analyse and compare children’s acquisition of phonotactic patterns in two regional areas in Lithuania: Southern Samogitia and Western High Lithuania. The sample of the study consisted of 48 children: 24 children living in Kelmė (representing the Raseiniškiai subdialect of Southern Samogitian) and 24 children living in Kaunas area (representing the Kauniškiai subdialect of Western High Lithuanian). The data was collected using a non-word repetition test task in Lithuanian.In general, since in Lithuanian dialects vowels differ more than consonants, the pronunciation of vowels serves as one of the main criteria used to define dialects. The main dialect divisions are based on the variants of the stressed diphthongs uo and ie when they occur in the non-final position in a word. In the Samogitian subdialects, the vowels o and ė are pronounced as uo and ie (for example, kuoje [= koja] and dieti [= dėti]); the diphthongs uo and ie are pronounced as long vowels ū and ī.The results of the current research have disclosed that some features of the Raseiniškiai subdialect of Southern Samogitian prevail in children’s language. For example, instead of the vowel o, children employ uo: geluoša [= geloša], talabuosa [= staligosa]; instead of the vowel u, they opt for uo: lasmuove [= lasmuvi]; and instead of the vowel e, they tend to use ei: šveila [= švela].The results of the research also demonstrate that Lithuanian children apply the typical universal strategies of pronunciation simplification, mostly substitution and omission; other strategies, such as consonant assimilation, metathesis, sound migration to another syllable, and sound addition, were much less frequent

Consonant · Diphthong · Linguistics · Lithuanian · Phonology · Phonotactics · Pronunciation · Speech recognition · Vowel · Computer Science · Language Development and Disorders · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Phonetics and Phonology Research · Psychology

  • Žurnalo „Taikomoji kalbotyra“ dešimtmetis. Publikacijų apžvalga

    Open Access•Meilutė Ramonienė, Kinga Geben•Taikomoji kalbotyra•2022

  • Consonant clusters in child phonology and the directionality of syllable structure assignment

    Open Access•Conxita Lleó, Michael Prinz•Journal of Child Language•1996

  • Dėl veiksmažodžių su formantais -sk- , -šk

    Open Access•Erdvilas Jakulis•Baltistica•2005

  • Sources of Markedness in Language Structures

    Wolfgang U Dressler•Folia Linguistica Historica•2001

  • On the predictiveness of Natural Morphology

    Open Access•Wolfgang U Dressler•Journal of Linguistics•1985

  • Evaluating models of phonotactic constraints on the basis of sC cluster acquisition data

    Open Access•Marta Marecka, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk•Language Sciences•2014

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae