Parental strategies in argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtimes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22342134 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Antonio Bova (0000-0002-6371-0371, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 379-401 |
| Publication date | 2019-10-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Language and Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2210-4119 • E-ISSN: 2210-4127 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/ld.00048.bov |
| OpenAlex | W2982451058 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 41 |
This study focuses on parent-child argumentation to identify the argumentative strategies most frequently used by parents to resolve in their favor the process of negotiation occurring during argumentative dialogues with their children at mealtime. Findings of the analysis of 132 argumentative dialogues indicate that parents mostly use arguments based on the notions of quality and quantity in food-related discussions. The parents use other types of arguments such as the appeal to consistency, the arguments from authority, and the arguments from analogy, in discussions related to the teaching of correct behaviors in social situations within and outside the family context. The results of this study show how parents and children contribute to co-constructing the dialogic process of negotiating their divergent opinions
Analogy · Appeal · Argumentation theory · Argumentative · Developmental psychology · Dialogic · Epistemology · Negotiation · Pedagogy · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems
Parental argumentative strategies during parent-child homework interactions in China
The risks of misunderstandings in family discourse
Co-construction of argumentative discussions between parents and children during mealtime conversations. A pragma-dialectical analysis
“But the vanilla is healthy!” Children's expression of arguments to justify their non-compliances in family conversation
Argumentation Schemes
The Skills of Argument
A Systematic Theory of Argumentation
The dialogic construction of justifications and arguments of a seven-year-old child within a ‘democratic’ family
Children's responses in argumentative discussions relating to parental rules and prescriptions
Beyond conflicts
Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes
The interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children's reactions and topics of disagreement during family conversations
A Developmental View on Children’s Arguing
Mutual Apprentices
Invoking the Authority of Feelings as a Strategic Maneuver in Family Mealtime Conversations
Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction
Family Narrative as Political Activity
You must eat the salad because it is nutritious”. Argumentative strategies adopted by parents and children in food-related discussions at mealtimes
Argumentation in Psychology
Arguments and relationships within the family
Development of justification in disputes with mother and sibling
The Terms of Agreement
Regulatory comments as tools of family socialization
Conversational actions and category relations
Investigating children’s Why-questions
The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization
Scenes of family life
On mitigation
The epistemics of social relations
Planning a Typical Italian Meal
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2026 (7) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |