The Skills of Argument
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 23391012 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Deanna Kuhn (0000-0002-1321-3289, Columbia University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1991 |
| Páginas | 678-693 |
| Data de publicação | 1991-07-26 |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | BOOK |
| Periódico | Skills of Argument (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/cbo9780511571350 |
| OpenAlex | W1792550766 |
| Open Library | OL34458617M |
| ISBN | 9780511571350 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 317 |
| Referências citadas | 3 |
The Skills of Argument presents a comprehensive empirical study of informal reasoning as argument, involving subjects across the life span. Subjects ranging in age from adolescence to late adulthood were asked to describe their views on social problems that people have occasion to think and talk about in everyday life, such as crime and unemployment. In addition to providing supporting evidence for their theories, subjects were asked to contemplate alternative theories and counterarguments and to evaluate new evidence on the topics. This is the first major study of informal reasoning across the life span. Highlighting the importance of argumentive reasoning in everyday thought, the book offers a theoretical framework for conceptualizing and studying thinking as argument. The findings address issues of major importance to cognitive and developmental psychologists, as well as educators concerned with improving the quality of people's thinking. The work is also relevant to philosophers, political scientists, and linguists interested in informal reasoning and argumentive discourse.
Argument (complex analysis) · Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Perspective (graphical) · Sociology · Computer Science · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Case studies · Reasoning (Psychology)
Turn-Taking and Disagreement
Activity-bound and activity-unbound arguments in response to parental eat-directives at mealtimes
Children's evaluative skills in informal reasoning
Co-construction of argumentative discussions between parents and children during mealtime conversations. A pragma-dialectical analysis
Realising ‘dialogic intentions’ when working with a microblogging tool in secondary school classrooms
The interplay between parental argumentative strategies, children's reactions and topics of disagreement during family conversations
Favoring argumentative disciplinary discussions in the classroom. A study of teacher's questions at undergraduate and graduate levels
Argumentation in science education as an evolving concept
A Plea for Ecological Argument Technologies
Mashing, Burning, Mixing and the Destructive Creativity of Web 2.0
Resilience and Higher Order Thinking
Learning to Solve Problems
Micro
Examining students' use of online annotation tools in support of argumentative reading
Connecting Parliament to the Public via the Internet
Mental simulation and argument
Commonsense rape judgments
On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change
Development and evaluation of a WebQuest-based teaching programme
Online and face-to-face role-play simulations in promoting social work students’ argumentative problem solving
Preparing learners to self-explain video examples
Negotiated assessment and teacher learning
Clashing epistemologies
How do teachers reason about their practice? Representing the epistemic nature of teachers’ practical knowledge
Exploring the relationship between pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and sustainability of an innovative science teaching approach
Biology instruction using a generic framework of scientific reasoning and argumentation
Can teachers implement a student-centered dialogical argumentation method across the curriculum
Fostering reasoned decisions
The epistemological stance between the knower and the known
Habilidades de argumentación escrita
Individual differences in distinguishing licit from illicit ways of discharging the burden of proof
Managing relationships in everyday practice
Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students
Improving argumentation through student blogs
The effects of in-class debates on argumentation skills in second language education
Contemplation and Conceptual Change
The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school
Dual systems Competence ←-→ Procedural processing
The Development of Scientific Reasoning Skills
Language and Social Psychology
Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns
Determining the Quality of Competence Assessment Programs
Children at risk
Changing Stances on Abortion During Case-Based Reasoning Tasks
Science on the Web
Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument
Argumentation in Psychology
Changing Minds
Patterns of Discourse in Two Kinds of Literature Discussion
Cicero's Authority
Examining how classroom communities developed practice-based epistemologies for science through analysis of longitudinal video data
The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building
Learning and Development in Nonuniversal Theory
An Exchange
Engagement in philosophical dialogue facilitates children’s reasoning about subjectivity
Development of scientific reasoning biases
Bias in adolescents' everyday reasoning and its relationship with intellectual ability, personal theories, and self-serving motivation
The Perils of Political Competition
Bounded reason in a social world
Handbook of Epistemic Cognition
Croyances épistémologiques de futurs enseignants du secondaire
Engineering Students’ Epistemological Thinking in the Context of Project-Based Learning
Logical and Hypothetical Reasoning in Adolescence, Development of
Morality
Mathematical Learning
The Theory of Cultural and Social Selection
Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection
Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
Examining the effects of classroom discussion on students’ comprehension of text
The rationality of informal argumentation
Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking.
A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning
The curious case of climate change
Argumentation-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (ABCSCL)
Individual differences in rational thought.
Dimensionality and Disciplinary Differences in Personal Epistemology
Learning to Teach Argumentation
The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Self-Regulated Learning
Argumentation for Learning
Promoting Argument-Counterargument Integration in Students' Writing
Learning to Feel Like a Scientist
Epistemic Thinking in Action
Personal Epistemology Research
Addressing Challenges to Public Understanding of Science
Framing for scientific argumentation
Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation
The Development of Epistemological Theories
Metacognitive theories
Toward a more dialogic pedagogy
Student Thought and Classroom Language
Styles of Scientific Reasoning: A Cultural Rationale for Science Education?
Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics
A learning progression for scientific argumentation
Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments
Teaching and learning science as argument
Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education
A Framework for Designing Scaffolds That Improve Motivation and Cognition
Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues
Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions
| Obras citantes distintas | 317 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 9,61 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1993 - 2026 (34) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Sim |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 257 |