Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political communication in U. S. Senate campaign victory and concession speeches

A qualitative study of how winners and losers manage presentation of self

Bibliographic Data

ID22342271
AuthorsAngela Cora Garcia (0000-0003-1052-5364, Bentley University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume16
Issue2
Pages181-205
Publication date2026-06-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage and Dialogue (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2210-4119 • E-ISSN: 2210-4127
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/ld.00222.gar
OpenAlexW7152541472
LanguageEN
References cited25

This qualitative study investigates how candidates for the U.S. Senate make persuasive use of interactional techniques and strategies in victory and concession speeches to manage impressions and create positive presentations of self as candidates, politicians, and persons. The analysis shows how concessions and victory claims are constructed, how concession phone calls to the winning candidate are described, and how candidates manage audience responses to references to these issues in the concession or victory speeches. Given political polarization and division in current U. S. politics, better understanding of political communication in victory and concession speeches may be useful for analytical and practical purposes, and may also provide a foundation for future studies of shifting norms for this genre of political communication

Disappointment · Phone · Political communication · Politics · Victory · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics

  • A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation

    Gail Jefferson•Pragmatics & Beyond New Series•2004

  • Doing Conversation Analysis

    Paul Ten Have•Doing Conversation Analysis•2007

  • Talk in Action

    Open Access•J Heritage, E Clayman et al.•Talk in Action•2010

  • Dialogue – The Mixed Game

    Edda Weigand•Dialogue•2010

  • Advances in Membership Categorisation Analysis

    Richard Fitzgerald, Richard J FitzGerald et al.•Advances in Membership…•2015

  • Sequence Organization in Interaction

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Sequence Organization in…•2007

  • The types and functions of humor in the work of a United States Senator

    Open Access•Angela Cora Garcia•Language and Dialogue•2021

  • Principles of New Science

    Open Access•Edda Weigand•Language and Dialogue•2023

  • How Reflection Works in Transformative Dialogue/Mediation

    Open Access•Angela Cora Garcia, Erik Cleven•Qualitative Sociology Review•2024

  • Tweeting in defeat

    Open Access•Michael Mirer, Michael L Mirer et al.•New Media & Society•2013

  • Land, Wood, Water, and Space

    Open Access•Jessica M Hayden, Matthew J Geras et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Applied conversational analysis

    Charles Antaki•Applied conversational analysis•2011

  • Moving forward with membership categorization analysis

    Open Access•E Stokoe•Discourse Studies•2012

  • Words and Their Ways in Campaign '08

    Open Access•Roderick P Hart, Colene J Lind•American Behavioral Scientist•2010

  • Election 2004 Concession and Victory Speeches

    Open Access•Jennifer Willyard, Kurt Ritter et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2005

  • Killers' and 'Friendlies

    Alec Mchoul•Social Identities•2007

  • The organization of repair in classroom talk

    Open Access•A Mchoul, A W Mchoul•Language in Society•1990

  • The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation

    Emanuel A Schegloff, Gail Jefferson et al.•Language•1977

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae