“Hold on, do I really need this?”
Countering impulse clothing purchases through short reflections
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22355415 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maja Grünzner (0000-0001-8191-2121, University of Vienna, corresponding author), Isabel Richter (0000-0003-1196-2769, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Isabell Richter, Mathew P White (0000-0002-4168-7289, University of Vienna), Sabine Pahl (0000-0002-3799-6716, University of Vienna) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Pages | 100280 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cleaner and Responsible Consumption (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2666-7843 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100280 |
| OpenAlex | W4410101899 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 46 |
Fast fashion deliberately targets young consumers’ purchase impulse tendencies. It is based on a poor-quality production, high turnover model and has quickly become a major contributor to clothing-related pollution worldwide. This study examines whether reflection tasks can reduce young consumers’ (aged 18–34) purchase impulses and if environmental considerations influence their decisions. Using a pre-registered online experimental vignette study with a between-participant design, 1,123 UK-based young consumers were randomly allocated to one of three reflection tasks or a control group. The tasks involved (1) thinking of general reasons not to buy (Reflection Neutral), (2) thinking of reasons not to buy including environmental considerations (Reflection Environment) or (3) recalling a happy memory with a favourite clothing item (Reflection Desire). Findings revealed that participants in Reflection Neutral and Reflection Environment conditions reported significantly lower purchase desire and purchase likelihood compared to the control group, with no significant difference between these two conditions. Reflection Desire did not reduce purchase desire or likelihood compared to the control. These results suggest that targeted reflection tasks, particularly those involving reasons not to buy a clothing piece, have the potential to promote more sustainable consumption behaviours. Real-world validation of these findings could contribute to efforts to reduce fast fashion’s environmental impact
Advertising · Business · Clothing · Commerce · Economics · Physics · Political science · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Consumer Retail Behavior Studies · Fashion and Cultural Textiles · Law
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Imaginary Relish and Exquisite Torture
Impulse buying
Changes in materialism, changes in psychological well-being
The environmental price of fast fashion
Self-Regulation Failure
Integrating Models of Self-Regulation
The theory of planned behavior
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour
Sustainable anti-consumption of clothing
The Psychology of Pro-Environmental Communication
Reflective and Impulsive Determinants of Social Behavior
High Self‐Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success
A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour—A meta-analysis
Implementation intentions
Everyday temptations
The Buying Impulse
Normative Influences on Impulsive Buying Behavior
Spent Resources
Yielding to Temptation
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |