Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Partisanship supersedes race

Effects of discussant race and partisanship on Whites' willingness to engage in race-specific conversations

Bibliographic Data

ID2236471
AuthorsOsei Appiah (0000-0002-2483-2392, The Ohio State University, corresponding author), W P Eveland (0000-0002-4761-1066, The Ohio State University), Christina M Henry (0000-0002-0799-7347, The Ohio State University)
Year2024
Volume50
Issue3
Pages378-392
Publication date2024-06-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Communication Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0360-3989 • E-ISSN: 1468-2958
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/hcr/hqad055
OpenAlexW4389902222
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited66

White participants in the United States were asked to imagine having a hypothetical conversation about race-specific issues with either a White or Black discussant who was described as either a Republican or Democrat. Participants' expectations of encountering negative outcomes during the conversation, and their intentions to avoid the conversation, were measured. The black sheep effect posits that harmful ingroup members are evaluated more negatively than comparable outgroup members because they threaten the ingroup's social identity. Findings indicate discussants' partisanship is more important than their race in guiding respondents' expectations of and desire to engage in cross-group conversations. Whites expected more negative outcomes and intended to avoid conversations more when they imagined talking about race with White discussants from a different political party than they did Black discussants from a different party, Black discussants from the same party, or White discussants from the same party. Intergroup threat and social identity theories are discussed

Conversation · Identity (music · Ingroups and outgroups · Outgroup · Race (biology · Social group · Social identity theory · Sociology · White (mutation · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Communication · Gender Studies · Social Psychology

  • Do They Even Care? Empirical Evidence for the Importance of Listening in Democracy

    Ethan C Busby, Andrew Ifedapo Thompson et al.•Political Communication•2025

  • Listening, Race, Partisanship, and Politics

    Open Access•W P Eveland, Osei Appiah et al.•Political Communication•2025

  • The Great Alignment

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•The Great Alignment•2018

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • Color Blindness and Interracial Interaction

    Open Access•Michael I Norton, Samuel R Sommer et al.•Psychological Science•2006

  • Ideology and Prejudice

    Open Access•John R Chambers, Barry R Schlenker et al.•Psychological Science•2013

  • When Attitudes Do Not Fit

    Open Access•Anette Rohmann, Ursula Piontkowski et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2008

  • Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans

    Open Access•Samantha L Moore-Berg, Lee-Or Ankori-Karlinsky et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2020

  • Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes

    Open Access•Blake M Riek, Eric W Mania et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2006

  • Ingroup Favoritism and Outgroup Derogation

    Open Access•Osei Appiah, Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick et al.•Journal of Communication•2013

  • The Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis

    Open Access•Mark J Brandt, Christine Reyna et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2014

  • The Role of Threats in the Racial Attitudes of Blacks and Whites

    Open Access•Walter G Stephan, Kurt A Boniecki et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2002

  • In-Group or Out-Group Extemity

    Open Access•Nyla R Branscombe, Daniel L Wann et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1993

  • On the Precipice of a “Majority-Minority” America

    Open Access•Maureen A Craig, Jennifer A Richeson•Psychological Science•2014

  • Americans are more exposed to difference than we think

    Open Access•W P Eveland, Osei Appiah et al.•Social Networks•2018

  • An experimental approach to Intergroup Threat Theory

    Kimberly Rios, Nicholas Sosa et al.•European Review of Social…•2018

  • Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization

    Open Access•Rupert Brown, Susan Condor et al.•Journal of Occupational Psychology•1986

  • Breaking Barriers, Crossing Borders, Building Bridges

    Open Access•Biren A Nagda•Journal of Social Issues•2006

  • A National Conversation About Race? Political Discussion Across Lines of Racial and Partisan Difference

    Open Access•W P Eveland, Osei Appiah•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2019

  • Cautions Regarding the Interpretation of Regression Coefficients and Hypothesis Tests in Linear Models with Interactions

    Andrew F Hayes, Carroll J Glynn et al.•Communication Methods and Measures•2012

  • The Impact of Political Identity and Outgroup Partisan Media Contact on Intergroup Bias and Unwillingness to Compromise with the Opposing Party

    Mei‐chen Lin, Paul M Haridakis•Mass Communication & Society•2021

  • Why we can’t talk openly about race

    Open Access•Osei Appiah, W P Eveland et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2021

  • Interethnic Interactions

    Open Access•E Ashby Plant, David A Butz et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2008

  • When extended contact opens the door to future contact

    Open Access•Antonio Gomez, Linda R Tropp et al.•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2011

  • A test of imagined contact as a means to improve cross-partisan feelings and reduce attribution of malevolence and acceptance of political violence

    Benjamin R Warner, Alejandro Mojica Villamil et al.•Communication Monographs•2017

  • Black sheep and expectancy violation

    Open Access•Monica Biernat, Theresa K Vescio et al.•European Journal of Social…•1999

  • Using the Black Sheep Effect to reveal normative stakes

    Open Access•Grégory Lo Monaco, Anthony Piermattéo et al.•European Journal of Social…•2011

  • How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta‐analytic tests of three mediators

    Open Access•T F Pettigrew, Linda R Tropp•European Journal of Social…•2008

  • Ingroup bias and the ‘black sheep’ effect

    Open Access•José M Marques, Elisabete M Robalo et al.•European Journal of Social…•1992

  • United we stand

    Open Access•Amarina Ariyanto, Matthew J Hornsey et al.•European Journal of Social…•2010

  • In the worst rather than the best of times

    Jacquie D Vorauer, Stacey J Sasaki•Journal of Personality and Social…•2011

  • Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members

    Dominic Abrams, Sally B Palmer et al.•Developmental Psychology•2014

  • Perceived Intragroup Variability as a Function of Group Status and Identification

    Open Access•Bertjan Doosje, Naomi Ellemers et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1995

  • It's only funny if we say it

    Open Access•Michael Thai, Alex M Borgella et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2019

  • When your friends matter

    Open Access•Daryl A Wout, Mary C Murphy et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2010

  • When group members dissent

    Open Access•Anna‐kaisa Reiman, Anna-Kaisa Reiman et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022

  • Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions

    Richard J Crisp, Richard N Turner•American Psychologist•2009

  • Disagreement and the Avoidance of Political Discussion

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Gregory A Huber et al.•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Political Intolerance, Right and Left

    Open Access•Jarret T Crawford, Jane M Pilanski•Political Psychology•2014

  • Can Interparty Contact Reduce Affective Polarization? A Systematic Test of Different Forms of Intergroup Contact

    Magdalena Wojcieszak, Benjamin R Warner•Political Communication•2020

  • The “Who” Matters

    Alyssa C Morey, W P Eveland et al.•Political Communication•2012

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Prejudice and politics

    Donald R Kinder, David O Sears•Journal of Personality and Social…•1981

  • Expect the unexpected

    Robyn K Mallett, Timothy D Wilson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Salience of ethnicity in the spontaneous self-concept as a function of one's ethnic distinctiveness in the social environment

    William J Mcguire, Claire V Mcguire et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1978

  • European Journal of Social Psychology

    Ara Norenzayan, Norbert Schwarz•European Journal of Social…•2006

  • Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments

    Norbert L Kerr, Robert W Hymes et al.•Law and Human Behavior•1995

  • Intergroup Contact Theory

    T F Pettigrew•Annual Review of Psychology•1998

  • Outrageous political opinion and political anxiety in the US

    Open Access•Sarah Sobieraj, Jeffrey M Berry et al.•Poetics•2013

  • Cross-cutting Social Networks

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•American Political Science Review•2002

  • Generalizing About Messages

    Open Access•Sally Jackson, Scott Jacob et al.•Human Communication Research•1983

  • A Macrosociological Theory of Social Structure

    Peter M Blau•American Journal of Sociology•1977

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae