Measuring strategic knowledge in multiple text reading
Links to strategy use and comprehension
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22415500 |
|---|---|
| Authors | SeongYeup Kim (0000-0002-3703-8243, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author), Pui-Wa Lei (0000-0002-8179-6623, Pennsylvania State University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 85 |
| Pages | 102458 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Contemporary Educational Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0361-476X • E-ISSN: 1090-2384 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2026.102458 |
| OpenAlex | W7142968361 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
We developed and validated the MTSKI to measure knowledge of multiple-text reading strategies. • IRT analyses supported the MTSKI’s reliability and unidimensional structure. • Integrative strategy items were more informative at higher proficiency levels. • MTSKI predicted intra- and inter-textual comprehension beyond control variables. • MTSKI advances research and instruction in strategic multiple-text reading. Although effective strategy use is essential for successful multiple-text comprehension, little attention has been given to systematically measuring students’ knowledge of such strategies. While existing research has primarily focused on assessing strategy use, validated tools to measure readers’ knowledge of multiple-text reading strategies remain lacking. To address this gap, this study developed and validated the Multiple-Text Strategy Knowledge Inventory (MTSKI), designed to assess students’ declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge of strategies for comprehending and integrating information across multiple texts. Grounded in established theoretical models of multiple-text comprehension and strategy use, the MTSKI was administered to 194 ninth-grade students in South Korea. Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses supported a unidimensional structure, with the inventory demonstrating strong reliability and validity. Items targeting deeper-level integrative strategies were more informative at higher ability levels. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that strategy knowledge significantly predicted both intra-textual and inter-textual comprehension, even after controlling for prior knowledge and strategy use. These findings highlight the foundational role of strategy knowledge in supporting complex reading tasks and offer a validated tool for advancing both research and educational practice in multiple-text reading.
Comprehension · Metacognition · Multilevel model · Reading comprehension · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Reading and Literacy Development · Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Metacognitive theories
Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts
Promoting Integration of Multiple Texts
Mirt
Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies
The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension
Strategy Use in Learning From Multiple Texts
Development and validation of Second Language Online Reading Strategies Inventory
Promoting integration and learning from multiple complementary texts
Noharm
Self-Explanation and Reading Strategy Training (Sert) Improves Low-Knowledge Students’ Science Course Performance
Task‐Oriented Learning With Multiple Documents
Comprehending and Learning From Internet Sources
Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts
Multiple aspects of high school students' strategic processing on reading outcomes
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |