Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring strategic knowledge in multiple text reading

Links to strategy use and comprehension

Bibliographic Data

ID22415500
AuthorsSeongYeup Kim (0000-0002-3703-8243, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author), Pui-Wa Lei (0000-0002-8179-6623, Pennsylvania State University)
Year2026
Volume85
Pages102458
Publication date2026-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueContemporary Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0361-476X • E-ISSN: 1090-2384
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.cedpsych.2026.102458
OpenAlexW7142968361
LanguageEN
References cited39

We developed and validated the MTSKI to measure knowledge of multiple-text reading strategies. • IRT analyses supported the MTSKI’s reliability and unidimensional structure. • Integrative strategy items were more informative at higher proficiency levels. • MTSKI predicted intra- and inter-textual comprehension beyond control variables. • MTSKI advances research and instruction in strategic multiple-text reading. Although effective strategy use is essential for successful multiple-text comprehension, little attention has been given to systematically measuring students’ knowledge of such strategies. While existing research has primarily focused on assessing strategy use, validated tools to measure readers’ knowledge of multiple-text reading strategies remain lacking. To address this gap, this study developed and validated the Multiple-Text Strategy Knowledge Inventory (MTSKI), designed to assess students’ declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge of strategies for comprehending and integrating information across multiple texts. Grounded in established theoretical models of multiple-text comprehension and strategy use, the MTSKI was administered to 194 ninth-grade students in South Korea. Item Response Theory (IRT) analyses supported a unidimensional structure, with the inventory demonstrating strong reliability and validity. Items targeting deeper-level integrative strategies were more informative at higher ability levels. Hierarchical regression analysis revealed that strategy knowledge significantly predicted both intra-textual and inter-textual comprehension, even after controlling for prior knowledge and strategy use. These findings highlight the foundational role of strategy knowledge in supporting complex reading tasks and offer a validated tool for advancing both research and educational practice in multiple-text reading.

Comprehension · Metacognition · Multilevel model · Reading comprehension · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Reading and Literacy Development · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • Metacognitive theories

    Open Access•Gregory Schraw, David Moshman•Educational Psychology Review•1995

  • Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts

    Open Access•Yasuhiro Ozuru, Kyle B Dempsey et al.•Learning and Instruction•2009

  • Promoting Integration of Multiple Texts

    Open Access•Shuli Barzilai, Asnat R Zohar et al.•Educational Psychology Review•2018

  • Mirt

    Open Access•R Philip Chalmers•Journal of Statistical Software•2012

  • Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies

    Open Access•Peter Afflerbach, P David Pearson et al.•The Reading Teacher•2008

  • The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension

    Walter Kintsch•Psychological Review•1988

  • Strategy Use in Learning From Multiple Texts

    Open Access•Allison List, Patricia A Alexander•Frontiers in Education•2020

  • Development and validation of Second Language Online Reading Strategies Inventory

    Open Access•Jie Li•Computers & Education•2020

  • Promoting integration and learning from multiple complementary texts

    Matthew T McCrudden, Jonna M Kulikowich et al.•Journal of Educational Psychology•2022

  • Noharm

    Colin Fraser, Roderick P McDonald•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1988

  • Self-Explanation and Reading Strategy Training (Sert) Improves Low-Knowledge Students’ Science Course Performance

    D S Mcnamara•Discourse Processes•2017

  • Task‐Oriented Learning With Multiple Documents

    Open Access•Ivar Bråten, Matthew T McCrudden et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2018

  • Comprehending and Learning From Internet Sources

    Open Access•Susan R Goldman, Jason L G Braasch et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2012

  • Improving Questioning–Answering Strategies in Learning from Multiple Complementary Texts

    Open Access•Núria Castells, Marta Minguela et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2022

  • Multiple aspects of high school students' strategic processing on reading outcomes

    Open Access•Meghan M Parkinson, Daniel L Dinsmore•British Journal of Educational…•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae