Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Multifaceted Role of Trust in Circular Ecosystems

A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Bibliographic Data

ID22418482
AuthorsInken Hoeck (0000-0002-2002-8428, Department of Business & Economics Neu‐Ulm University of Applied Sciences Neu‐Ulm Germany), Tassilo Schuster (0000-0001-7123-2720, Department of Business & Economics Neu‐Ulm University of Applied Sciences Neu‐Ulm Germany)
Year2026
Publication date2026-05-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBusiness Strategy and the Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4733 • E-ISSN: 1099-0836
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/bse.71021
LanguageEN
References cited111

Circular ecosystems connect diverse actors who collaborate to close resource loops and pursue sustainable goals without centralized control. Such arrangements entail heightened interdependence and uncertainty, making trust, understood as the willingness to accept vulnerability based on positive expectations of others' behavior, a critical enabling condition. Despite its importance, existing research offers only fragmented insights into trust within circular ecosystems. This study addresses the question of how trust emerges, interacts, and evolves across the lifecycle of circular ecosystem collaborations by synthesizing evidence from a systematic review of 73 peer‐reviewed studies. The findings reveal a phase‐based pattern of trust dynamics. In the formation phase, calculus‐based trust helps actors engage despite uncertainty, supported by contracts and digital tools. Shared values can also accelerate the development of identification‐based trust, fostering early information sharing and joint problem‐solving. In the development phase, trust interacts with interpersonal relationships, organizational structures, and technological systems, as actors coordinate activities and negotiate interdependencies. In the maturity phase, identification‐based trust, rooted in shared purpose, enables resilient collaboration under rising complexity. In addition, the study indicates that digital platforms and blockchain support early coordination; however, they cannot replace the relational depth needed for long‐term cooperation. The review contributes to a lifecycle‐oriented, multidimensional understanding of trust in circular ecosystems. It offers practical strategies for building robust trust architectures, including early value alignment, continuous interpersonal engagement, and participatory digital governance.

  • The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust

    Kevin Werbach, Paul T Jaeger et al.•Blockchain and the New…•2018

  • Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effects of Interorganizational and Interpersonal Trust on Performance

    Akbar Zaheer, Bill Mcevily et al.•Organization Science•1998

  • The limits of trust-free systems

    Open Access•Florian Hawlitschek, Benedikt Notheisen et al.•Electronic Commerce Research and…•2018

  • Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems

    Philipp Schmidt, Felix Biessmann et al.•Journal of Decision Systems•2020

  • Orchestrating industrial ecosystem in circular economy

    Open Access•Vinit Parida, Thommie Burström et al.•Journal of Business Research•2019

  • Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce

    D Harrison McKnight, Vivek Choudhury et al.•Information Systems Research•2002

  • An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

    F David Schoorman, Robert C Mayer et al.•Academy of Management Review•2007

  • Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships

    Roy J Lewicki, Barbara Benedict Bunker•Trust in Organizations•1996

  • From circular business models to circular business ecosystems

    Open Access•Wisdom Kanda, Martin Geissdoerfer et al.•Business Strategy and the…•2021

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • Affect- And Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.

    Daniel J McAllister•Academy of Management Journal•1995

  • Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research

    Open Access•Dennis A Gioia, Kevin G Corley et al.•Organizational Research Methods•2013

  • Conceptualizing the circular economy

    Open Access•Julian Kirchherr, Denise Reike et al.•Resources Conservation and…•2017

  • Not So Different After All

    Denise M Rousseau, Sim B Sitkin et al.•Academy of Management Review•1998

  • An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

    Robert C Mayer, Roger C Mayer et al.•Academy of Management Review•1995

  • On the intricate relationship between data and theory, and the potential gain afforded by capturing very low levels of media trust

    Open Access•Fanny Lalot, Rainer Greifeneder•Journal of Trust Research•2024

  • Enabling battery circularity

    Open Access•Koteshwar Chirumalla, Ignat Kulkov et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2024

  • Enabling a viable circular ecosystem for electric vehicle batteries

    Open Access•Johan Wellten, Jannis Angelis et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2025

  • How to build business ecosystems for e-waste online recycling platforms

    Open Access•Qiao Sun, Chang Wang et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Interorganizational Sensemaking of the Transition Toward a Circular Value Chain

    Open Access•Marianne Kuhlmann, Johannes Meuer et al.•Organization & Environment•2023

  • Digital Platforms for the Circular Economy

    Open Access•Outi Blackburn, Paavo Ritala et al.•Organization & Environment•2023

  • Swift Trust and Temporary Groups

    Debra Meyerson, Karl E Weick et al.•Trust in Organizations•1996

  • Tools for promoting industrial symbiosis

    Open Access•Zhiquan Yeo, Donato Masi et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2019

  • Transforming existing local ecosystems to circular economy ecosystems for plastics

    Open Access•Virginie Litaudon, Yiran Chen•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2023

  • Circular ecosystems

    Open Access•Raphael Aryee, Wisdom Kanda et al.•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2025

  • Economic Action and Social Structure

    Mark Granovetter•American Journal of Sociology•1985

  • Towards a circular business ecosystem of used electric vehicle batteries – A modelling approach

    Open Access•Magnus Hellström, Benedikte Wrålsen•Sustainable Futures•2024

  • From interpersonal to interorganisational trust

    Open Access•Bart Vanneste, Bart S Vanneste•Journal of Trust Research•2016

  • Conceptualising time as a level of analysis

    M Audrey Korsgaard, Jason Kautz et al.•Journal of Trust Research•2018

  • Trust in strategic alliances

    Bo Bernhard Nielsen•Journal of Trust Research•2011

  • Towards a research agenda on how, when and why trust and distrust matter to coopetition

    Open Access•Angelos Kostis, Malin Näsholm et al.•Journal of Trust Research•2019

  • Circular Economy

    Open Access•Jouni Korhonen, ANTERO HONKASALO et al.•Ecological Economics•2017

  • Theory Construction in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Stefan Timmerman, Iddo Tavory•Sociological Theory•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae