Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Was the fruit in front of me or near the river? Biological relevance and reference frame preferences in object-location memory across the lifespan

Bibliographic Data

ID22420476
AuthorsSilvia Serino (0000-0002-8422-1358, University of Milano-Bicocca, corresponding author), Giuseppe Riva (0000-0003-3657-106X, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Claudia Repetto (0000-0001-8365-7697, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), Karine Marie Goulene, Karine Goulene (IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano), Marco Stramba-Badiale (IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano), Cosimo Tuena (0000-0002-2039-9202, Università degli Studi eCampus)
Year2026
Volume33
Issue6
Publication date2026-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychonomic Bulletin & Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1069-9384 • E-ISSN: 1531-5320
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3758/s13423-026-02961-0
PMID42469551
OpenAlexW7169601387
LanguageEN
References cited58

Spatial memory research has traditionally focused on how environmental features shape the use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames, with little attention to the role of the objects themselves. Here, using two datasets collected with a virtual reality object-location memory task, we investigated whether the biological relevance of objects modulates spatial memory performance depending on the reference frame used at retrieval. Participants encoded the positions of biological entities and artifacts and retrieved them using either egocentric or allocentric recall cues. In Study 1, young adults ( N = 37) showed a significant interaction between object category and recall cue: biological entities were recalled more accurately under allocentric than egocentric retrieval, while artifacts showed the opposite pattern, though the category difference was significant only under allocentric retrieval. In Study 2, older adults and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment ( N = 80) showed a preserved biological advantage in overall spatial performance, whereas the interaction with recall cue was no longer observed, a pattern consistent with the reduced allocentric contribution typically associated with aging. These findings provide initial evidence that object categories may shape the retrieval of spatial locations.

Cognition · Frame of reference · Recall · Reference frame · Spatial cognition · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Spatial Cognition and Navigation · Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction

  • Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise

    Open Access•Joshua New, Leda Cosmides et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2007

  • Animacy effect in the mnemonic advantage

    Open Access•Shi Cheng, Xiaomei Zhao et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2025

  • The effects of spatial stability and cue type on spatial learning

    Open Access•Matthew G Buckley, Joe M Austen et al.•Cognition•2021

  • Egocentric and allocentric memory recall strategies moderate transfer action sentence recognition

    Open Access•Cosimo Tuena, Daniele Di Lernia et al.•Language and Cognition•2025

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae