Using co-creation to explore important aspects of peer-mentoring for undergraduate students
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22423753 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catherine Thompson (0000-0002-7967-7019, Liverpool Hope University, corresponding author), Chenelle Ashun (0009-0006-8170-9952, Liverpool Hope University), Caroline Knowles (Liverpool Hope University), Eve Binks (0000-0003-2397-6674, Liverpool Hope University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-15 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Innovations in Education and Teaching International (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1470-3297 • E-ISSN: 1470-3300 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14703297.2026.2681744 |
| OpenAlex | W7163682741 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 26 |
The challenges facing students in Higher Education are increasing. Peer mentoring can be used to support students, promote integration, and reduce drop-out, yet any peer-mentoring programme should meet the needs of students without replacing other forms of support. This project used two co-creation workshops to explore undergraduate student (N = 9) and staff (N = 4) values of academic and pastoral support, to inform the design of future peer mentoring programmes. Thematic analysis was conducted on the audio recordings of the workshops. Themes included issues impacting mentees and mentors, and the mechanics of peer mentoring. These align with past research; however, there was a clear emphasis on the wellbeing of the mentors, showing the importance of providing training and support for peer mentors. Co-creation gives a voice to students and staff and is an innovative way to approach peer mentoring. This method could be used to design future peer-mentoring programmes.
Higher education · Peer feedback · Peer group · Peer mentoring · Peer review · Qualitative research · Teaching method · Thematic analysis · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Higher Education Research Studies · Mentoring and Academic Development
Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula
Student dropout from universities in Europe
Dropout from Higher Education
Factors contributing to university dropout
The impact of natural environments and biophilic design as supportive and nurturing spaces on a residential college campus
The new tyranny of student participation? Student voice and the paradox of strategic-active student-citizens
Matching by value congruence for high-quality mentoring
Student–staff partnerships in learning and teaching
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Peer mentoring during the transition to university
| Highly cited | No |
|---|