Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Curriculum design in disaster and mass casualty education

A scoping review of healthcare education

Bibliographic Data

ID22424684
AuthorsNaglaa Mohamed Abdelhamied (Dubai Health Authority), Abu Omayer (Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences), Salma Abdalla Elmisbah (Dubai Health Authority), Mohamed Alali (Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences), Hossam Hassan Yussef (Dubai Health Authority), Azza Yousif (Dubai Health Authority), Ives Hubloue (0000-0002-4535-801X, Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Nabil Zary (0000-0001-8999-6999, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences)
Year2026
Publication date2026-07-17
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBMC Medical Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1472-6920 • E-ISSN: 1472-6920
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12909-026-09818-z
PMID42464265
OpenAlexW7168483424
LanguageEN

BACKGROUND: Effective disaster and mass casualty incident (MCI) response depends on healthcare professionals who can apply clinical, operational, and team-based competencies under pressure. However, existing reviews have not comprehensively mapped how disaster and MCI curricula are designed, delivered, and evaluated across healthcare education settings. OBJECTIVE: To map the structure, educational strategies, competency focus, and outcome evaluation approaches of disaster and MCI education curricula for healthcare learners and professionals. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley's framework, JBI guidance, and PRISMA-ScR reporting. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched for English-language studies published from 2015 to 2025. The search was updated on 6 January 2026. Two reviewers independently screened studies and charted data. Outcomes were mapped using Moore's Expanded Outcomes Framework. RESULTS: Forty-one studies were included. Curricula were classified as stand-alone (n = 14, 34.1%), embedded (n = 16, 39.0%), longitudinal (n = 4, 9.8%), or model proposals (n = 7, 17.1%). Outcome evaluation was concentrated at lower Moore levels: 22 studies (53.7%) assessed satisfaction, 16 (39.0%) assessed declarative knowledge, 18 (43.9%) assessed procedural knowledge, 15 (36.6%) assessed competence in simulated or controlled settings, and 5 (12.2%) assessed real-world performance. No study assessed patient-, community-, or system-level outcomes. Only six studies (14.6%) explicitly targeted interprofessional learner groups. CONCLUSION: Disaster and MCI education curricula are increasingly reported but remain heterogeneous in structure and evaluation. Future curricula should strengthen alignment between competencies, teaching methods, and assessments; include interprofessional learning where relevant; and use feasible approaches to assess competence and real-world performance.

Curriculum · Disaster medicine · Disaster planning · Health care · Mass Casualty · Mass-casualty incident · MEDLINE · Poison control · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae