Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Online learning with a ChatGPT-assisted revision approach to EFL graph writing

Students’ performance and perceptions

Bibliographic Data

ID22428201
AuthorsShu-Chiao Tsai (University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), S C Tsaï (0000-0002-0541-5593, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology)
Year2026
Pages1-24
Publication date2026-03-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInnovation in Language Learning and Teaching (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1750-1229 • E-ISSN: 1750-1237
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17501229.2026.2645994
OpenAlexW7139135577
LanguageEN
References cited54

Purpose: This study focused on investigating the performance and perceptions of 139 non-English major EFL students completing graph writing with a five-step technology-enhanced learning performance (TELP) mode of the ChatGPT-assisted revision approach.Design/methodology/approach: The study adopted a pretest and post-test quasi-experimental design. A five-step TELP mode based on Chapelle’s (1998) principles for the development of multimedia CALL was implemented to create an online learning environment. Its implementation was conducted in two phases: helping students revise and evaluate their pre-writing scripts and directly revising their post-writing scripts. Students’ performance was evaluated by three types of free online computational assessments. A questionnaire on Google Forms was administered to elicit their experience and perceptions.Findings: Students with different English proficiencies employed different ways of using AI-based tools to complete the pre-writing; they also had different pre-writing outcomes. The linguistic features that ChatGPT generated on students’ pre-writing were classified into 12 categories, and their frequency was significantly correlated with students’ pre-writing performance evaluated by the other two computational assessments in this study. Students with low English proficiency adopted the strategy of L1 to L2 translation through using AI-based tools to achieve better pre-writing performance than high-proficiency students who did not use AI-based tools. Students’ performance for revision did not vary with their English proficiency and was significantly improved in delivering more professional vocabulary, expressing more lexical words, showing higher writing scores, and having a lower probability of writing errors, with effect sizes ranging from 0.14 to 0.82. Students thought that the ChatGPT-assisted revision approach on graph writing was convenient, rapid, and easy, and its feedback was rich, clear, well explained, easy to understand, and of good quality.Originality/value: This study contributes to the growing body of research on learning with the implementation of ChatGPT. Based on Chapelle’s suggested principles for the development of multimedia CALL (1998), the implementation of a five-step TELP mode of the ChatGPT-assisted revision approach in graph writing was proposed. The measurement results of evaluating students’ multiple writing features using different technological assessment tools were consistent. Implications for the implementation of ChatGPT in language learning and future studies are discussed.

Graph · Language acquisition · Online learning · Perception · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Text Readability and Simplification

  • Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation

    Open Access•Cuiping Song, Yanping Song•Frontiers in Psychology•2023

  • Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring

    Open Access•Atsushi Mizumoto, Masaki Eguchi•Research Methods in Applied…•2023

  • Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills

    Open Access•Sitakant Mahapatra•Smart Learning Environments•2024

  • Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency

    Open Access•Mark D Johnson•Journal of Second Language Writing•2017

  • “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”

    Open Access•Mark Feng Teng•Computers and Education:…•2024

  • Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum

    Open Access•Da Yan•Education and Information…•2023

  • Using ChatGPT for second language writing

    Open Access•Jessie S Barrot•Assessing Writing•2023

  • Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?

    Open Access•Michele Salvagno, Fabio Silvio Taccone et al.•Critical Care•2023

  • Generative artificial intelligence for automated essay scoring

    Open Access•Jessie S Barrot•Assessing Writing•2026

  • Lexical richness in Chinese university students’ EFL writing

    Open Access•Yang Yang, Xianyou He et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • The Intersection of Computer-Assisted-Language-Learning and SLA

    Open Access•Abdenbi El Harrath•International Journal of…•2024

  • Implementing the digital multimodality of a Google Translate-assisted approach to online academic EFL reading

    Open Access•Shu-Chiao Tsai, S C Tsaï•Australasian Journal of…•2025

  • Exploring second language writers’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback

    Open Access•Behice Ceyda Cengiz, Zeynep Bilki et al.•System•2025

  • Modelling the Role of L2 Writing Anxiety in Graph-based Composing Performance and Strategy Use

    Open Access•Hamideh Abolhasani, Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar et al.•Journal of Psycholinguistic…•2022

  • The effect of graph complexity and planning on graph writing performance and descriptive strategies

    Open Access•Seyyed Ehsan Golparvar, Mahsa Azizsahra•Foreign Language Annals•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae